Skip to content

Conversation

@BillWagner
Copy link
Member

@BillWagner BillWagner commented Mar 21, 2019

Fixes #5432
Fixes #7506

Contributes to #8206

Internal review links:
What's new in C# 7
Explore C# 7

Copy link
Contributor

@rpetrusha rpetrusha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've left a number of suggestions and comments, @BillWagner. I've requested changes rather than approved, since I'd like to review this again once it becomes more interactive.

@BillWagner BillWagner force-pushed the make-new-7-interactive branch from 57c1b06 to 3b09b46 Compare March 22, 2019 14:42
BillWagner added a commit to BillWagner/samples that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2019
Many of the samples changed.  This sample now supports "What's new in C# 7", and the exploratory tutorial for C# 7.

Required for dotnet/docs#11442
@BillWagner BillWagner marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2019 17:29
@BillWagner BillWagner force-pushed the make-new-7-interactive branch from 14ce792 to 699ad23 Compare March 27, 2019 17:34
Copy link
Contributor

@pkulikov pkulikov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit-picking on C# versions. Please ignore most of suggestions if "C# 7" is by design: as an intention to cover C# 7.x features (to include those from C# 7.1...7.3 later)

Co-Authored-By: BillWagner <wiwagn@microsoft.com>
BillWagner added a commit to dotnet/samples that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2019
Many of the samples changed.  This sample now supports "What's new in C# 7", and the exploratory tutorial for C# 7.

Required for dotnet/docs#11442
@BillWagner
Copy link
Member Author

closing and opening for a new build

@BillWagner BillWagner closed this Mar 28, 2019
@BillWagner BillWagner reopened this Mar 28, 2019
@BillWagner
Copy link
Member Author

@rpetrusha I just updated the build, and gave it a quick look. It's ready for a fresh review.

@BillWagner
Copy link
Member Author

One of pattern matching samples behaves incorrectly in the try.net experience See dotnet/try#175

These don't work unless the sample in the browser is a full program. Ref returns in snippets don't compile in the current scaffolding.
Copy link
Contributor

@rpetrusha rpetrusha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good, @BillWagner. Once the REPL is working, we should remember to revisit the interactive examples to make sure that they work. I've left a number of comments and suggestions, but feel free to merge when you want and, if necessary, address them later.

Co-Authored-By: BillWagner <wiwagn@microsoft.com>
Ron Petrusha and others added 3 commits March 29, 2019 14:39
@BillWagner BillWagner merged commit b6f21eb into dotnet:master Mar 29, 2019
@BillWagner BillWagner deleted the make-new-7-interactive branch March 29, 2019 19:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Observation on "Generalized async return types" New content: tutorial on using C# Tuples

4 participants