CC59892: Removing "public" from code #5955
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Hello, @mairaw, This proposed file change comes from https://github.com/dotnet/docs.ru-ru/pull/110. Contributor comment: "You can not use access modifiers with explicit implementation" Could you review this contribution and help to merge if agreed? Many thanks in advance.
BillWagner
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2018
Member
BillWagner
left a comment
BillWagner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This change is correct. I'll 
now.
Thanks @v-maudel
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks @BillWagner |
mairaw
added
Area - C# Guide
loc
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello, @mairaw ,
This proposed file change comes from https://github.com/dotnet/docs.ru-ru/pull/110.
Contributor comment: "You can not use access modifiers with explicit implementation"
Could you review this contribution and help to merge if agreed?
Many thanks in advance.