Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support raw SQL queries without defining an entity type for the result #10753

Closed
Tracked by #21888 ...
anpete opened this issue Jan 23, 2018 · 85 comments · Fixed by #29931
Closed
Tracked by #21888 ...

Support raw SQL queries without defining an entity type for the result #10753

anpete opened this issue Jan 23, 2018 · 85 comments · Fixed by #29931
Labels
area-query closed-fixed The issue has been fixed and is/will be included in the release indicated by the issue milestone. ef6-parity punted-for-6.0 punted-for-7.0 Originally planned for the EF Core 7.0 (EF7) release, but moved out due to resource constraints. type-enhancement
Milestone

Comments

@anpete
Copy link
Contributor

anpete commented Jan 23, 2018

For Query Types it could be nice to not require a configuration call in OnModelCreating to add the type to the model. Instead, it may be possible to lazily add a type to the model on first access (usually query).

@mrlife
Copy link

mrlife commented Apr 9, 2018

@anpete I see where this allows raw sql to be run for a given context (existing class), but what about raw sql that is custom? Is there a way to just run a SQL command (e.g. a select) and get an object that contains the resulting rows (regardless of what tables the command includes)?

Source 1
Source 2

@anpete
Copy link
Contributor Author

anpete commented Apr 9, 2018

@mrlife A Query Type can be any shape you want. Define the type; add it to the model as a Query Type; and then query it using FromSql.

@mrlife
Copy link

mrlife commented Apr 9, 2018

@anpete That's definitely nice to have. I think the heart of what I'm looking for is a way to skip creating any model classes and just run a query and get a result. Are there any plans to support that, either in EF Core or in some way within an ASP.NET Core project?

@anpete
Copy link
Contributor Author

anpete commented Apr 9, 2018

@mrlife What would be the type of the result?

@mrlife
Copy link

mrlife commented Apr 9, 2018

@anpete This kind of query is a huge part of our business, where we use joins and row_number a lot.

I suppose there are many ways to approach how to dynamically create one or more objects to hold whatever is returned from the database (based on detected database column types). That's probably a long discussion on a desirable way to do that. It's not clear if there are any options currently available in ASP.NET Core that handle this.

Examples in .NET:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.data.sqlclient.sqldatareader
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/data/adonet/ado-net-code-examples

@anpete
Copy link
Contributor Author

anpete commented Apr 9, 2018

@mrlife As you point out, ADO is the currently recommended way of doing this. NB: You can easily integrate ADO usage with EF, take a look at the DbContext.Database property.

It sounds like you want EF to do something here. Given that you don't want any mapping capabilities, what exactly would EF be adding over ADO? Perhaps providing an example code snippet would help.

@mrlife
Copy link

mrlife commented Apr 9, 2018

@anpete An ORM by itself would not provide any value with the types of queries we're running, however if EF Core with ADO is the way in ASP.NET Core to run any SQL and get a result set, then that's what we need.

I looked at Configuring a DbContext, but it's not clear how to use it without an explicit model file. Is that possible?

@anpete
Copy link
Contributor Author

anpete commented Apr 9, 2018

@mrlife It is completely fine to just use ADO from ASP.NET Core - you don't need to use EF at all.

@Vasim-DigitalNexus
Copy link

Vasim-DigitalNexus commented May 15, 2018

RE: it may be possible to lazily add a type to the model on first access

That would be fantastic; although, I was wondering if you could also give us the option to do add a DbQuery at runtime ourselves as well

Something like:

if (dbContext.Model.FindEntityType(typeof(T)) == null) dbContext.AddQuery(typeof(T));

@mrlife
Copy link

mrlife commented Jun 12, 2018

@anpete From your last comment, I'm having trouble finding documentation for this for aspnet core. Are you aware of any?

@smitpatel
Copy link
Contributor

@mrlife - There is nothing special in ASP.NET core when it comes to using ADO.NET provider directly. We are not aware of any docs for that. But it wouldn't be much different from how you would use ADO.NET provider from any code.

@Vasim-DigitalNexus
Copy link

Vasim-DigitalNexus commented Jun 28, 2018

Is there any way I could implement this in EF 2.2 (meant 2.1) as it is right now?

I was looking for a way to add DbQuery to the DbContext at runtime

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

@Vasimovic What do you mean by, "implement this in EF 2.2"? Do you mean can you implement this in the EF code and send a PR? Or do you mean, can you implement something on top of EF in your own code that will allow types to be added to the model dynamically?

@Vasim-DigitalNexus
Copy link

Hi @ajcvickers, sorry, I meant 2.1, and yes something on top of EF in my own code that will allow types to be added to the model dynamically

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

@Vasimovic The main limitation in EF Core to be aware of is that the model is read-only once it is being used by a context instance. (Mostly because multiple threads may be accessing it and mutation is not thread-safe.) So, the way to do this now is to build a new model when you need to add a new type, then create a new context instance that uses that model. Whether or not this is practical depends mostly on performance. That is, building a model is expensive, and caching many models will use a lot of memory.

@Vasim-DigitalNexus
Copy link

I need it in the same context, I am in the process of migrating a project from EF 6 to EF Core and have about 200 view-only models, adding the DbQuery to the context for 200 of them seemed a bit 😄 - Anyhow #10753 will be very useful for me

Thank you for taking your time to respond @ajcvickers much appreciated

@jenergm
Copy link

jenergm commented Aug 9, 2018

Hi @ajcvickers,
We would like to know if SqlQuery<TElement> will be released in the next version of .NET Core. It's so important to us to make compatible on changing our .NET Framework applications to .NET Core and to the Cloud in the close future.
Have you any schedule for this implementation?
Cheers,

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

@jenergm The milestone for each issue indicates the release in which a fix for the issue is planned to ship. Currently we have tentative planning (subject to change) for two releases: 2.2, and 3.0. Issues, like this one, that are in the Backlog milestone are planned to be post 3.0.

@jenergm
Copy link

jenergm commented Aug 9, 2018

Hi @ajcvickers. Thanks for sharing the roadmap.

@jenergm
Copy link

jenergm commented Oct 30, 2018

Hi @ajcvickers , how's going?
I overhear .NET Core 3.0 will release starting 2019. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dotnet/2018/05/07/net-core-3-and-support-for-windows-desktop-applications/

Are you know if SqlQuery<TElement> will be released in that next version of .NET Core?

Best regards,

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

@jenergm Not as currently planned.

@ajcvickers ajcvickers added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Jan 9, 2023
@ajcvickers ajcvickers added closed-fixed The issue has been fixed and is/will be included in the release indicated by the issue milestone. and removed consider-for-next-release needs-design labels Jan 9, 2023
ajcvickers added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2023
Fixes #10753

Builds an ad-hoc entity type and uses it to query when `SqlQuery` is called for a type that does not have a type mapping.

Things to consider:

- The entity type cannot have relationships
- Properties are mapped by convention and mapping attributes are respected.
- The entity types are keyless.
ajcvickers added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 12, 2023
Fixes #10753

Builds an ad-hoc entity type and uses it to query when `SqlQuery` is called for a type that does not have a type mapping.

Things to consider:

- The entity type cannot have relationships
- Properties are mapped by convention and mapping attributes are respected.
- The entity types are keyless.
@ErikEJ
Copy link
Contributor

ErikEJ commented Jan 13, 2023

Amazing. So this will be in daily build now?

@jenergm
Copy link

jenergm commented Jan 13, 2023

Thank you @ajcvickers!

I think it is this:
public static IQueryable SqlQuery(
this DatabaseFacade databaseFacade,
[NotParameterized] FormattableString sql)
Where calls that:
=> SqlQueryRaw(databaseFacade, sql.Format, sql.GetArguments()!);

Very good! Did it already have released?

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

@ErikEJ Should be.

@jenergm As the milestone indicates, it will be released in EF Core 8. However, it should be available now in the daily builds and will be included in preview 1 of EF8.

@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: 8.0.0, 8.0.0-preview1 Jan 29, 2023
@goenning
Copy link

goenning commented Mar 8, 2023

@ajcvickers just tried this feature today and I love it! This can easily replace Dapper for many and allow us to incrementally adopt EF Core.

One question though: will it support scalar values? This doesn't seem to work (only tested with npgsql).

_db.Database.SqlQuery<string>($"SELECT id FROM environments WHERE key = {appKey}").FirstOrDefault();

@Misiu
Copy link

Misiu commented Mar 9, 2023

will it support scalar values?

That would be awesome! Waiting for more info.

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

@goenning @Misiu Scalar values were already supported in EF7, and should still work. If this isn't the case, then please open a new issue and attach a small, runnable project or post a small, runnable code listing that reproduces what you are seeing so that we can investigate.

@Misiu
Copy link

Misiu commented Mar 9, 2023

@ajcvickers I've created a new issue showing this error: #30447 In my case I'm using SqlServer.

The issue is that EF generates this code:

exec sp_executesql N'SELECT TOP(1) [t].[Value]
FROM (
    SELECT name FROM dbo.test_table WHERE entity_id=@p0
) AS [t]',N'@p0 nvarchar(4000)',@p0=N'5A83F3C3-A88F-4A56-934C-FFB8D0E682C1'

instead of:

exec sp_executesql N'SELECT TOP(1) [p].[Name]
FROM (
    SELECT name FROM dbo.test_table WHERE entity_id=@p0
) AS [p]',N'@p0 nvarchar(4000)',@p0=N'5A83F3C3-A88F-4A56-934C-FFB8D0E682C1'

@goenning
Copy link

goenning commented Mar 9, 2023

Thanks @Misiu thsts the same error message I get using Postgres

@borisdj
Copy link

borisdj commented May 25, 2023

@ajcvickers I have posted related Q on SO:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76331657/dynamic-sub-select-using-expression-with-fromsqlraw-in-net-core-v7-with-cast
Can it be linked here, and can anyone take a look, or maybe to open separate issue.

@ite-klass
Copy link

@borisdj The linked question is confusing overall, but it adds a class definition to the DB context - so no, it's not directly relevant to this ticket - which is specifically about non-entity result types

@pcapozzi
Copy link

would it be possible to show an example of how to call a stored procedure with this new functionality?

@pcapozzi
Copy link

pcapozzi commented Oct 3, 2023 via email

@DavidThielen
Copy link

DavidThielen commented Oct 12, 2023

This is added, so great. I want to add that this is essential for calls that use FreeTextTable() and ContainsTable() in SQL Server.

@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: 8.0.0-preview1, 8.0.0 Nov 14, 2023
@ajcvickers ajcvickers removed their assignment Sep 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-query closed-fixed The issue has been fixed and is/will be included in the release indicated by the issue milestone. ef6-parity punted-for-6.0 punted-for-7.0 Originally planned for the EF Core 7.0 (EF7) release, but moved out due to resource constraints. type-enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.