Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Query: inconsistent behavior between relational and InMemory/L2O for queries grouping by a constant #19683

Closed
maumar opened this issue Jan 23, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #27931
Assignees
Labels
area-query closed-fixed The issue has been fixed and is/will be included in the release indicated by the issue milestone. type-bug
Milestone

Comments

@maumar
Copy link
Contributor

maumar commented Jan 23, 2020

In relational we ignore groupby constant or parameter, so we just generate simple select. However, on InMemory and Linq2Objects we generate a single grouping with the key.

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

Talk with @smitpatel on this. Related to client-grouping.

@smitpatel
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #19027

@smitpatel
Copy link
Member

StartsWith(null) is exception in client-side. If we consider the result as false then the translation on relational is incorrect. It should group by false and just generate 1 grouping.

@AndriySvyryd AndriySvyryd modified the milestones: Backlog, MQ Sep 14, 2021
@smitpatel
Copy link
Member

Poached

@smitpatel smitpatel assigned smitpatel and unassigned maumar May 3, 2022
@smitpatel smitpatel modified the milestones: MQ, 7.0.0 May 3, 2022
@smitpatel smitpatel added the closed-fixed The issue has been fixed and is/will be included in the release indicated by the issue milestone. label May 3, 2022
smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2022
Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.
- Erase client projection when applying aggregate operation over GroupBy result.
- When processing result selector in GroupBy use the updated key selector if the select expression was pushed down.

Resolves #27132
Resolves #27266
Resolves #27433
Resolves #23601
Resolves #27721
Resolves #27796
Resolves #27801
Resolves #19683

Relates to #22957
smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2022
Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.
- Erase client projection when applying aggregate operation over GroupBy result.
- When processing result selector in GroupBy use the updated key selector if the select expression was pushed down.

Resolves #27132
Resolves #27266
Resolves #27433
Resolves #23601
Resolves #27721
Resolves #27796
Resolves #27801
Resolves #19683

Relates to #22957
smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2022
Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.
- Erase client projection when applying aggregate operation over GroupBy result.
- When processing result selector in GroupBy use the updated key selector if the select expression was pushed down.

Resolves #27132
Resolves #27266
Resolves #27433
Resolves #23601
Resolves #27721
Resolves #27796
Resolves #27801
Resolves #19683

Relates to #22957
smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 4, 2022
Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.
- Erase client projection when applying aggregate operation over GroupBy result.
- When processing result selector in GroupBy use the updated key selector if the select expression was pushed down.

Resolves #27132
Resolves #27266
Resolves #27433
Resolves #23601
Resolves #27721
Resolves #27796
Resolves #27801
Resolves #19683

Relates to #22957
smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 4, 2022
…7931)

Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.
- Erase client projection when applying aggregate operation over GroupBy result.
- When processing result selector in GroupBy use the updated key selector if the select expression was pushed down.

Resolves #27132
Resolves #27266
Resolves #27433
Resolves #23601
Resolves #27721
Resolves #27796
Resolves #27801
Resolves #19683

Relates to #22957
@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: 7.0.0, 7.0.0-preview5 May 25, 2022
@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: 7.0.0-preview5, 7.0.0 Nov 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-query closed-fixed The issue has been fixed and is/will be included in the release indicated by the issue milestone. type-bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants