-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SQLServer: Support fill factor for index #20634
Conversation
ralmsdeveloper
commented
Apr 14, 2020
- Resolve SQL Server Index Fill Factor #19147
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we also add tests:
- in
SqlServerBuilderExtensionsTest
similar to the existing ones forIncludeProperties()
, (here might be a good place to test theArgumentOutOfRangeException
s I mention below too), and - in
SqlServerModelDifferTest
- see the existing tests forIsCreatedOnline
. Plus please add a test to make sure that the model differ picks it up if you change only the fillfactor from one valid value to another.
src/EFCore.SqlServer/Migrations/SqlServerMigrationsSqlGenerator.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/EFCore.SqlServer.Tests/Design/Internal/SqlServerAnnotationCodeGeneratorTest.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/EFCore.SqlServer.Tests/Metadata/SqlServerBuilderExtensionsTest.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
23be175
to
6718165
Compare
@lajones rebase is done! |
test/EFCore.SqlServer.Tests/Metadata/SqlServerBuilderExtensionsTest.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/EFCore.SqlServer.Tests/Migrations/SqlServerModelDifferTest.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test/EFCore.SqlServer.Tests/Migrations/SqlServerModelDifferTest.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a few small comments / naming changes and we're good to go. Thanks very much @ralmsdeveloper !
This is now merged. Thanks once again @ralmsdeveloper. |