Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up stored procedure tests as NonSharedModelTestBase #29331

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2022

Conversation

roji
Copy link
Member

@roji roji commented Oct 12, 2022

This is a test-only change which redoes the sproc tests as NonSharedModelTestBase, making them much less brittle and encapsulating each tests requirements inside the test. Since these tests are new, I'd like to get this in for 7.0 if possible, so that external providers can use this new model and not have to do another change later.

@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Oct 12, 2022

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

@danmoseley tell-mode Test-only changes.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 12, 2022

Hello @roji!

Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.

p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.

protected virtual void CreateStoredProcedures(DbContext context, string createSprocSql)
{
foreach (var batch in
new Regex("^GO", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase | RegexOptions.Multiline, TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(1000.0))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feel free to ignore, but regex timeouts are a protection against DOS attacks - I assume input here is trusted. Given that test machines are occasionally perversely slow, I wonder whether you want a timeout here, or if a timeout then a large one like 1 min.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, this is test-only code which we already use elsewhere, and haven't ever seen timeouts AFAIK... We can definitely crank it up if this happens (or just not use regex for this trivial thing).

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 12, 2022

Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, I've been configured to only merge when all checks have explicitly passed. The following integrations have not reported any progress on their checks and are blocking auto-merge:

  1. Azure Pipelines

These integrations are possibly never going to report a check, and unblocking auto-merge likely requires a human being to update my configuration to exempt these integrations from requiring a passing check.

Give feedback on this
From the bot dev team

We've tried to tune the bot such that it posts a comment like this only when auto-merge is blocked for exceptional, non-intuitive reasons. When the bot's auto-merge capability is properly configured, auto-merge should operate as you would intuitively expect and you should not see any spurious comments.

Please reach out to us at fabricbotservices@microsoft.com to provide feedback if you believe you're seeing this comment appear spuriously. Please note that we usually are unable to update your bot configuration on your team's behalf, but we're happy to help you identify your bot admin.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 12, 2022

Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, it looks like release/7.0 is a protected branch and I have not been granted permission to perform the merge.

@roji roji merged commit bae981a into dotnet:release/7.0 Oct 12, 2022
@roji roji deleted the SprocTestCleanup branch October 12, 2022 18:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants