Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add analyzer tests #3990

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2023
Merged

Add analyzer tests #3990

merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2023

Conversation

geeknoid
Copy link
Member

@geeknoid geeknoid commented May 23, 2023

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@ghost ghost assigned geeknoid May 23, 2023
@danmoseley
Copy link
Member

Are all these tests new code, and need review, or just being copied over?

BTW why does description say 'null' above

@geeknoid
Copy link
Member Author

@danmoseley I don't know why the description said "null".

Yes, these are being bulk copied with minor edits to make things work. I'm not sure how come we decided to not copy these tests over in the first place.

Copy link
Member

@danmoseley danmoseley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM given tests were already reviewed. with caveat about R9 stuff being added

@geeknoid geeknoid enabled auto-merge (squash) May 23, 2023 20:09
@geeknoid geeknoid disabled auto-merge May 23, 2023 20:13
@geeknoid geeknoid enabled auto-merge (squash) May 23, 2023 20:37
@geeknoid geeknoid merged commit dc1b78e into main May 23, 2023
@geeknoid geeknoid deleted the geeknoid/analyzers branch May 23, 2023 21:00
geeknoid added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2023
Co-authored-by: Martin Taillefer <mataille@microsoft.com>
@RussKie RussKie added this to the 8.0 Preview5 milestone Jun 8, 2023
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 8, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants