Bugfix:: Make bound values available to filter clause for try-with in seq{} #17990
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
❗ Release notes required
|
abonie
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2024
vzarytovskii
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2024
T-Gro
deleted the
17930-try-with-within-seq-fails-to-capture-exception-variable
branch
This was referenced Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #17930 .
Before this PR, bound values were not available to the code in
whenfilter clauses.Even without a compiler error, this later lead to ilxgen issue of not having the values available as locals.
(the filter is compiled as a separate function returning 0/1)