-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 446
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding ppc64le arch for source build #14631
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This looks good on the source-build side, any concerns on the installer changes @marcpopMSFT ? |
Installer changes look reasonable. Would probably have to go through tactics for approval. |
@crummel, can you do the prep work to get tactics approval? TIA |
crummel
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2022
MichaelSimons
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2022
* Adding ppc64le arch for source build (#14631) * Remove llvm-project from source-build as we have removed this dependency in runtime. (#14697) * Remove llvm-project from source-build as we have removed this dependency in runtime. * Add patch for the backport PR to get this to build for now. * Remove unneeded copy of this patch. * [release/7.0.1xx] Update dependencies from dotnet/sdk (#14705) [release/7.0.1xx] Update dependencies from dotnet/sdk - Remove backported command-line-api patch * Don't use the MSBuild server process for init-build.proj. (#14643) * Don't use the MSBuild server process for init-build.proj. This appears to fix an issue where our SdkResolver is not loaded because there are still lingering dotnet processes when we try to binplace the resolver DLL. * Address code review feedback. * Update patch backport comments and remove obsolete patch (#14710) * [release/7.0.1xx] .NET Source-Build 7.0.100-rc.2 October 2022 Updates (#14728) * Update source-build to 7.0 RC2 * Also update tarball global.json * Don't touch root global.json in case it is managed by automation * Add back source-build patch that is still required in this branch Co-authored-by: Swapnali911 <Swapnali.Pawar1@ibm.com> Co-authored-by: Chris Rummel <crummel@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <42748379+dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Michael Simons <msimons@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Logan Bussell <loganbussell@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Jason Zhai <v-wuzhai@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Created PR to have #14617 changes in dotnet 7
Adding ppc64le arch for source build
Add support for IBM System Z architectures in source-build.
Description
Adds an additional RID in installer and source-build to support the System Z architecture.
Customer Impact
Enables use of the .NET SDK on IBM System Z.
Regression?
[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]
Risk
Infra change that just adds ppc64le as a supported build architecture and platform.
Verification
Packaging changes reviewed?