-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensemble to it's own package #2718
Ensemble to it's own package #2718
Conversation
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ | |||
|
|||
<PropertyGroup> | |||
<TargetFramework>netstandard2.0</TargetFramework> | |||
<IncludeInPackage>Microsoft.ML</IncludeInPackage> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this assembly go in a different nuget package?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess there aren't any public types in this assembly....?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have way to mark stable nugets vs experimental?
It's needed by NimbusML, but in same time, it feels weird to create nuget with zero public surface.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don’t have it yet. But #2279 will enable it. For now let’s make the new package and we can mark it experimental when we have that.
Btw We are creating a Parquet package now, but we don’t ship it.
We discuss and decided to leave it as it is for right now. |
I don't think the way it is right now is correct. Why are we shipping this assembly in the core nuget package? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's put this in.
Sorry, who discussed @Ivanidzo4ka ? Where? I think we need a new nuget to capture this. This would be the ensemble nuget, and it would be marked as experimental per #2279. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2718 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 71.66% 71.51% -0.16%
==========================================
Files 808 808
Lines 142253 142364 +111
Branches 16138 16121 -17
==========================================
- Hits 101950 101806 -144
- Misses 35864 36124 +260
+ Partials 4439 4434 -5
|
@Ivanidzo4ka - can you just keep this PR to be for |
Sure In reply to: 467669272 [](ancestors = 467669272) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @Ivanidzo4ka
@@ -260,6 +260,12 @@ Project("{2150E333-8FDC-42A3-9474-1A3956D46DE8}") = "Microsoft.Data.DataView", " | |||
EndProject | |||
Project("{9A19103F-16F7-4668-BE54-9A1E7A4F7556}") = "RemoteExecutorConsoleApp", "test\RemoteExecutorConsoleApp\RemoteExecutorConsoleApp.csproj", "{5E920CAC-5A28-42FB-936E-49C472130953}" | |||
EndProject | |||
Project("{2150E333-8FDC-42A3-9474-1A3956D46DE8}") = "Microsoft.ML.Ensemble", "Microsoft.ML.Ensemble", "{AD7058C9-5608-49A8-BE23-58C33A74EE91}" | |||
ProjectSection(SolutionItems) = preProject | |||
pkg\Microsoft.ML.Ensemble\Microsoft.ML.Ensemble.nupkgproj = pkg\Microsoft.ML.Ensemble\Microsoft.ML.Ensemble.nupkgproj |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not aware of us doing this elsewhere, but that's OK I guess.
fix #2717