Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port "DiagnosticDescriptor id fix" #3269

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2020
Merged

Port "DiagnosticDescriptor id fix" #3269

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2020

Conversation

genlu
Copy link
Member

@genlu genlu commented Feb 6, 2020

ReadonlyMethodGroupAllocationRule is using a name in the DiagnosticDescriptor id field, this corrects it to use an actual id.

This is ported from microsoft/RoslynClrHeapAllocationAnalyzer#76. Originally commited by @nnpcYvIVl

FYI @mjsabby

ReadonlyMethodGroupAllocationRule is using a name in the DiagnosticDescriptor id field, this corrects it to use an actual id.

This is ported from microsoft/RoslynClrHeapAllocationAnalyzer#76
@genlu genlu requested a review from a team as a code owner February 6, 2020 00:33
@genlu genlu changed the title DiagnosticDescriptor id fix Port "DiagnosticDescriptor id fix" Feb 6, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #3269 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3269      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.23%   95.23%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         978      978              
  Lines      221212   221212              
  Branches    14229    14229              
==========================================
- Hits       210665   210664       -1     
  Misses       8923     8923              
- Partials     1624     1625       +1

@genlu genlu merged commit 74134b6 into dotnet:master Feb 6, 2020
@genlu genlu deleted the Port76 branch February 6, 2020 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants