Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the required frameworks in the description #17942

Merged

Conversation

agocke
Copy link
Member

@agocke agocke commented Mar 17, 2017

The description of this package is vague and incorrect. We now require .NET 4.6, not
.NET 4.5, and that is only a build-time requirement, not a deploy requirement.

/cc @jasonmalinowski @jaredpar @dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure

The description of this package is vague and incorrect. We now require .NET 4.6, not
.NET 4.5, and that is only a build-time requirement, not a deploy requirement.
@@ -5,8 +5,7 @@
<description>
.Net Compilers package. Referencing this package will cause the project to be built using the specific version of the C# and Visual Basic compilers contained in the package, as opposed to any system installed version.

Supported Platforms:
- .NET Framework 4.5
This package can be used to compile code targeting any platform, but can only be run using the desktop .NET 4.6+ Full Framework.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"but requires .NET 4.6 to be installed on the developer or build machine"? "can only be run" seems an odd statement for a toolset.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestions? I waffled a bit on how to word this and didn't want to get too nitpicky.

@jasonmalinowski
Copy link
Member

jasonmalinowski commented Mar 17, 2017

@MattGertz this is a simple NuGet description update we're making after a customer was (understandably!) confused by our current description. We can put this in 15.1 so our next package there would get the update. Does this need a shiproom approval?

@MattGertz
Copy link
Contributor

@jasonmalinowski If it requires an insertion in d15rel, then it needs to go to Shiproom (and in that case, it definitely would not make the bar). If it is something we ship ourselves and don't inject into VS, then that would be different.

@jasonmalinowski
Copy link
Member

@MattGertz No insertion required. We just upload these to nuget.org as a separate process.

@MattGertz
Copy link
Contributor

Not a problem then.

@agocke
Copy link
Member Author

agocke commented Mar 20, 2017

test this please

@agocke
Copy link
Member Author

agocke commented Mar 20, 2017

test vsi please

@agocke agocke merged commit 7876285 into dotnet:dev15.1.x Mar 20, 2017
@agocke agocke deleted the rewrite-microsoft-net-compilers-description branch March 20, 2017 06:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants