Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Async-streams: allow pattern-based disposal in await using and foreach (#32731) #32815

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2019
Merged

Async-streams: allow pattern-based disposal in await using and foreach (#32731) #32815

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2019

Conversation

JoeRobich
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@JoeRobich JoeRobich requested a review from a team as a code owner January 26, 2019 00:54
jcouv
jcouv approved these changes Jan 26, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jcouv jcouv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@jcouv jcouv added this to the 16.0.P3 milestone Jan 26, 2019
@jcouv jcouv added the Feature - Async Streams Async Streams label Jan 26, 2019
@JoeRobich JoeRobich closed this Jan 26, 2019
@JoeRobich JoeRobich reopened this Jan 26, 2019
@JoeRobich JoeRobich merged commit c6d6c04 into dotnet:dev16.0-preview3 Jan 28, 2019
@JoeRobich JoeRobich deleted the async-streams-backport branch April 12, 2019 16:28
xoofx pushed a commit to stark-lang/stark-roslyn that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2019
@JoeRobich
Async-streams: allow pattern-based disposal in await using and foreach (
17fe865 
dotnet#32731) (dotnet#32815)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jcouv jcouv jcouv approved these changes

@jasonmalinowski jasonmalinowski jasonmalinowski approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Area-Infrastructure Feature - Async Streams Async Streams
Projects
None yet
Milestone
16.0.P3
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@JoeRobich @jasonmalinowski @jcouv