Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge master to features/readonly-members #33741

Merged

Conversation

dotnet-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This is an automatically generated pull request from master into features/readonly-members.

git fetch --all
git checkout merges/master-to-features/readonly-members
git reset --hard upstream/features/readonly-members
git merge upstream/master
# Fix merge conflicts
git commit
git push upstream merges/master-to-features/readonly-members --force

Once all conflicts are resolved and all the tests pass, you are free to merge the pull request.

fekberg and others added 3 commits February 25, 2019 17:54
Pointing to the proposal in the csharplang repository instead.
…ibutes (#33498)

* Add reproducer for #33388

* Skip normalizing task types if binding attribute arguments

* Use InAttributeArgument property

* Add test where task-like normalization affects overload resolution

* Update AttributeArgument_TaskLikeOverloadResolution test case

* Add assert and remove apparently unused branch

* Add back comparison of remaining parameter types with InAttributeArgument guard

* Update comment on remaining parameter comparisons

* Add comment describing why we don't normalize task types in attribute arguments
Documentation for Ranges returns a 404
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto-approval

@ghost ghost merged commit 7c3db02 into features/readonly-members Feb 28, 2019
@ghost ghost deleted the merges/master-to-features/readonly-members branch February 28, 2019 02:00
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants