Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ILCompiler package used in runtime without ensuring matching framework #106740

Open
ericstj opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

ILCompiler package used in runtime without ensuring matching framework #106740

ericstj opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@ericstj
Copy link
Member

ericstj commented Aug 20, 2024

Description

See #106729

When building the product we run on an older shared framework than the last built and consumed runtime.

Reproduction Steps

Build dotnet/runtime when it's using a MicrosoftDotNetILCompilerVersion newer than the dotnet version, and ILC depends on an API change in the framework.

Expected behavior

Build succeeds

Actual behavior

Failure because the tool framework is missing API required by ILC

Regression?

Yes, torn state introduced by #100845

Known Workarounds

No response

Configuration

No response

Other information

No response

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Aug 20, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Aug 20, 2024
@ericstj ericstj added area-NativeAOT-coreclr and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Aug 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke, @MichalStrehovsky, @jkotas
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@ericstj
Copy link
Member Author

ericstj commented Aug 20, 2024

Probably first introduced in #89655 (comment) where @jkotas predicted this problem.

@sbomer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants