Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Limit arm32 windows testing #38570

Closed
jashook opened this issue Jun 29, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #39655
Closed

Limit arm32 windows testing #38570

jashook opened this issue Jun 29, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #39655
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@jashook
Copy link
Contributor

jashook commented Jun 29, 2020

Limit windows arm32 testing. The PR loop will continue to build windows arm32. We can remove all stress testing and testing in the runtime pipeline. We can still continue to test windows arm32 in coreclr-outerloop.

@BruceForstall let me know if this meshes with the conversation we had. If not we can change the plan as we see fit to enable the quality bar the team needs for arm32 investigations.

@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot Dotnet-GitSync-Bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jun 29, 2020
@jashook jashook removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jun 29, 2020
@BruceForstall
Copy link
Member

This matches my understanding of our plan.

@Gnbrkm41
Copy link
Contributor

Gnbrkm41 commented Jul 4, 2020

Does this apply to ARM64 as well? I remember ARM64 pipelines not running for PR validation some months ago.

@BruceForstall
Copy link
Member

Does this apply to ARM64 as well?

No, arm64 is fully supported. At this point I don't think arm64 is missing from any CI testing.

@erozenfeld erozenfeld added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Jul 6, 2020
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants