-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Limit arm32 Windows testing. #39655
Limit arm32 Windows testing. #39655
Conversation
@jashook Any idea why I'm getting
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/39655/checks?check_run_id=891553015 |
@dotnet/runtime-infrastructure Any idea why I'm getting
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/39655/checks?check_run_id=891553015 |
I tried rerunning it manually and I'm getting: No plan found for identifier aee3bf87-841d-4319-af75-e94d845e410f. Could you try ammending the commit and force pushing? |
eng/pipelines/runtime-official.yml
Outdated
@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ stages: | |||
- Linux_musl_arm64 | |||
- Windows_NT_x86 | |||
- Windows_NT_x64 | |||
- Windows_NT_arm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the official build, which means if we remove this, we will stop producing an arm
runtime. Is that desired?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is desired. However we may want to be the last people to remove so the upstack components do not break.
eng/pipelines/runtime-official.yml
Outdated
@@ -158,7 +157,6 @@ stages: | |||
- Linux_musl_arm64 | |||
- Windows_NT_x86 | |||
- Windows_NT_x64 | |||
- Windows_NT_arm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ditto.
eng/pipelines/runtime-official.yml
Outdated
@@ -199,7 +197,6 @@ stages: | |||
- Linux_musl_arm64 | |||
- Windows_NT_x86 | |||
- Windows_NT_x64 | |||
- Windows_NT_arm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ditto
@BruceForstall @jashook Do we want to remove Windows arm from official builds? |
Remove Windows arm32 testing from PRs. Builds are not removed. Remove Windows arm32 jitstress testing. Remove Windows arm32 builds from official builds. Outerloop still has Windows arm32 builds and testing.
I reverted the changes to runtime-official.yml. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm the only work left is to move arm64 testing onto the arm32 queue. This can be done in another pr.
Windows arm testing has been scaled back in dotnet#39655 so now we can start using better machines for Windows arm64 testing. These machines were previously used for Windows arm testing.
Remove Windows arm32 testing from PRs. Builds are not removed. Remove Windows arm32 jitstress testing. Remove Windows arm32 builds from official builds. Outerloop still has Windows arm32 builds and testing.
…otnet#39802) Windows arm testing has been scaled back in dotnet#39655 so now we can start using better machines for Windows arm64 testing. These machines were previously used for Windows arm testing.
Remove Windows arm32 testing from PRs. Builds are not removed.
Remove Windows arm32 jitstress testing.
Remove Windows arm32 builds from official builds.
Outerloop still has Windows arm32 builds and testing.
Resolves #38570.