Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tracking] Experimental WebAssembly multithreading support #68162

Open
27 of 40 tasks
lambdageek opened this issue Apr 18, 2022 · 19 comments
Open
27 of 40 tasks

[tracking] Experimental WebAssembly multithreading support #68162

lambdageek opened this issue Apr 18, 2022 · 19 comments
Assignees
Labels
arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-VM-threading-mono os-browser Browser variant of arch-wasm tracking This issue is tracking the completion of other related issues.
Milestone

Comments

@lambdageek
Copy link
Member

lambdageek commented Apr 18, 2022

This is a tracking issue for adding experimental support for WebAssembly multi-threading to the browser-wasm runtime pack.

High Level Goals

  • The threading runtime should be distributed in the same browser-wasm runtime pack The threading runtime is in a separate .multithread. runtime pack variant. The WASM SDK chooses the correct runtime pack variant based on project properties.
  • Threading should be opt-in only
  • The wasm bindings and runtime are thread-safe and co-op GC aware

Completed in .NET 7 RC2

The wasm-experimental workload supports threading using <WasmEnableThreads>true</WasmEnableThreads> in interp and AOT configurations when using the wasmbrowser workload. Blazor does not support threading in .NET 7

Tracking

SDK:

CI testing:

  • Need a way to skip tests on single threaded / multi-threaded wasm configs.
  • Add tests. (src/libraries). Maybe add some convenient way to add ProjectReferences to the multi-threaded ref assemblies (the roll-up Microsoft.NET.WebAssembly.Threading.proj doesn't seem to work) and run the normal runtime tests.

Libraries and Interop:

Diagnostics:

Runtime and codegen:

Issues:

Done

On the branch:

  • put all modifications under conditionals
    • The runtime build should be under /p:WasmEnableThreads=true
    • ref assemblies should use FeatureWasmThreads in project files and FEATURE_WASM_THREADS in C# code to conditionally include [UnsupportedOSPlatform("browser")] guards around multi-threading APIs, and include the ref assembly in Microsoft.NET.WebAssembly.Threading
    • CoreLib uses FeatureWasmThreads and FEATURE_WASM_THREADS to define System.Thread.IsThreadStartSupported. All other code should check System.Thread.IsThreadStartSupported to throw a PNSE. There should not be [UnsupportedOSPlatform("browser")] guards in CoreLib
    • EventPipe and diagnostics should use FeatureWasmPerfTracing and FEATURE_WASM_PERFTRACING (and a constant?).
  • Add separate browser-mt and browser-mt-eventpipe samples.
  • Land the branch changes in main

In .NET 7 RC2

In .NET 8

...

@lambdageek lambdageek added arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-Build-mono tracking This issue is tracking the completion of other related issues. labels Apr 18, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 18, 2022

Tagging subscribers to 'arch-wasm': @lewing
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

This is a tracking issue for adding experimental support for WebAssembly multi-threading to the browser-wasm runtime pack.

On the branch:

  • put all modifications under conditionals
    • The runtime build should be under /p:WasmEnableThreads=true
    • ref assemblies should use FeatureWasmThreads in project files and FEATURE_WASM_THREADS in C# code to conditionally include [UnsupportedOSPlatform("browser")] guards around multi-threading APIs, and include the ref assembly in Microsoft.NET.WebAssembly.Threading
    • CoreLib uses FeatureWasmThreads and FEATURE_WASM_THREADS to define System.Thread.IsThreadStartSupported. All other code should check System.Thread.IsThreadStartSupported to throw a PNSE. There should not be [UnsupportedOSPlatform("browser")] guards in CoreLib
    • EventPipe and diagnostics should use FeatureWasmDiagnostics and FEATURE_WASM_DIAGNOSTICS (and a constant?).
  • Separate browser-mt and browser-mt-eventpipe samples.
  • Land the branch changes in main

Experimental support in main:

  • Build artifacts for the /p:WasmEnableThreads=true should go into a separate output folder. In other words it should be possible to build with /p:WasmEnableThreads=false in the same tree and without the build artifacts interfering with each other.
  • The browser-wasm runtime pack should pack both single- and multi-threaded builds. The multithreaded build artifacts should go into an mt subfolder.
  • The Microsoft.NET.WebAssembly.Threading.nupkg ref assemblies package should be published to the dotnet7 feed
  • The browser-wasm SDK should support a WasmEnableThreads property that uses the mt subfolder from the runtime pack for the runtime artifacts and that adds a <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.NET.WebAssembly.Threading" IncludeAssets="compile" PrivateAssets="nonoe" /> package

EventPipe in main:

  • Some kind of runtime build with multi-threading enabled internally, but not for the user APIs - EventPipe should be enabled.
  • Save runtime artifacts from the EventPIpe build in an ep subfolder in the runtime pack
  • browser SDK changes to use the ep artifacts if a property is set.
  • JavaScript bindings to the EventPipe Session API - start stop sessions from JS, saving .nettrace to the VFS. Some convenience API to extract and download the .nettrace file

Issues:

  • Publish dotnet.worker.js
  • Need a hook for frameworks to identify the location of dotnet.js. Emscripten relies on mainScriptUrlOrBlob property on the module on the main threads to be set to the URL of dotnet.js so that it can locate dotnet.worker.js. Frameworks like Blazor sometimes rename dotnet.js and/or move the wasm artifacts into subdirectories. Provide a hook for them to tell the runtime where to find the files.
  • protect workers from unhandled JS exceptions. If user code uses setTimeout to queue work on the workers and that code throws unhandled exceptions, we should not bring down the whole runtime in a disorganized manner.
  • single-threaded VFS. Track Emscripten progress on the new VFS and upgrade when it's available.
  • Thread.Start().Wait pattern on the browser threads will deadlock. Emscripten relies on the browser thread's eventloop to start threads (unless we use a dedicated "main" thread when building). After a thread start, the browser thread's eventloop must run in order for new threads to start.

Ecosystem:

  • We need some way for package authors to provide single threaded and multi-threaded versions of native assets
Author: lambdageek
Assignees: -
Labels:

arch-wasm, area-Build-mono, tracking

Milestone: -

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Apr 18, 2022
@radical radical removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Apr 18, 2022
@lambdageek lambdageek added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Apr 18, 2022
lambdageek added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 26, 2022
Merge initial work on multi-threaded WebAssembly.

The normal wasm build is single-threaded.  There should be no functional changes to its behavior.

To enable a multi-threaded build pass `/p:WasmEnableThreads=true`.  See `src/mono/wasm/threads.md` for details.

The big changes are:
1. The normal ref assemblies related to threading retain `[UnsupportedOSPlatform("browser")]` attributes for various threading-related functions
2. In System.Private.CoreLib, the `[UnsupportedOSPlatform]` attributes are removed, and functions that used to always throw PNSE nwo do a runtime check using `System.Threading.Thread.IsThreadStartSupported` to check if threading is enabled in the current build. 
3. A new nuget `Microsoft.NET.WebAssembly.Threading` is created.  It contains experimental ref assemblies without the `[UnsupportedOSPlatform]` attributes.  The intention is that code opting into experimenting with multithreading will include this nuget by setting some property that will be used by the wasm MSBuild SDK to pick a multi-threaded runtime build and configure things appropriately.  (The SDK updates don't exist yet).
4. In the multi-threaded runtime we don't use Emscripten's "main thread" option (ie: the browser thread is the main one); we also continue to run certain runtime-internal jobs (finalizers, GC pump) on the main thread even in the multi-threaded runtime.

Remaining work is tracked in the related issue #68162

---

* Initial changes for emscripten 2.0.34

* Use emcc-link.rsp in build targets

* Use updated docker images

* Fix compiler warnings

* Put `--profiling-funcs` to `_EmccLinkFlags`

* Fix build

    src/mono/mono/mini/mini-runtime.c:3407:25: error: ‘invoke’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘revoke’?
       3407 |                         invoke = mono_marshal_get_runtime_invoke_dynamic ();

* Add shell to the environment

   Environment setting https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/blob/2.0.34/src/settings.js#L616-L641

   From emscripten 2.0.25 release notes

    - Support for the 'shell' environment is now disabled by default.  Running under
      `d8`, `js`, or `jsc` is not something that most emscripten users ever want to
      do, so including the support code is, more often than not, unnecessary.  Users
      who want shell support can enable it by including 'shell' in `-s ENVIRONMENT`
      (#14535).

   Example of the the size increase for bench sample:

    -a---          12/10/2021  3:35 PM         382113 dotnet.js
    -a---          12/13/2021 10:37 AM         383589 dotnet.js

* Add emcc-link.rsp to PlatformManifestFileEntry

* Feedback

   https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/blob/2fda25eea756c78c8cb024aa5b6c2b188bf7990f/src/settings.js#L1173-L1176

   -s EXPORT_ES6 is link option

* Bump emscripten version

* Bump llvm package version and use its libclang

* Use newer docker images with emscripten 3.1.1

* Remove unused variable

* Add runtime support for threads in the wasm build

   To enable, pass `/p:WasmEnableThreads` when building the runtime

   ./build.sh -Subset mono+libs -os Browser -arch wasm /p:WasmEnableThreads=true

* Prevent runtime from starting twice when loaded in a web worker

* Automatically populate the emscripten mainScriptUrlOrBlob property so that worker initialization can find dotnet.js

* Add compatibility shim so that emscripten's generated worker.js can properly get a Module instance, since we broke the API

* Checkpoint

* Bring back threadpool and add some tracing in diagnostics

* Add comments and fix a typo

* Introduce 'MonoObjectRef' ts type. Migrate mono_string_intern to not have a retval

* Checkpoint (strings are broken for some reason)

* Fix string interning

* Migrate ObjectToString and GetDateValue

* Checkpoint gc safe/unsafe region work

* More ref conversion

* Checkpoint (broken?)

* Fix missing method

* Fix incorrect signatures

* Fix lint

* Add new 'R' signature char for 'ref object'

* Remove AddEventListener and RemoveEventListener Checkpoint

* eslint fixes

* Update call_method signature to avoid passing raw object pointers

* Ref-ify one websocket API and fix types and incorrect rooting of two others

* Deprecation metadata

* More ref

* Remove outdated comments

* Convert typed_array_new to ref

* Add volatile modifiers, satisfy eslint

* Update src/mono/wasm/runtime/corebindings.c

* Missing conflict

* Fix build, set coop gc, and always copy dotnet.worker.js when it's around for apps

* Disable sample profiler, add some functions that were missing from katelyn's PR.

* Add safepoint around ep_rt_wait_event_set.  Tweak sample to explicitly exit wasm in order to properly flush event to the nettrace file (w/ rundown events).

* [gc] Start the GC Finalizer thread on threaded WASM

* [mono] add GC Unsafe in mono_assembly_load; remove in EventPipe

   Remove GC Unsafe hack in ep_rt_wait_event_set

* post-merge cleanup: delete duplicated definitions

* [sample] Env vars should be stringy

* updated dotnet.d.ts

* Add mono_threads_wasm_async_run_in_main_thread; do background work on main

   Don't start a finalizer thread

   Queue all background work to run on the main thread

* [mono] Fix non-threaded wasm build

* Add a System.Threading.Thread.WebAssembly.Threading ref assembly

* Update the browser sample to use System.Threading.Thread.WebAssembly.Threading

* Rationalize System.Threading.Thread build

   In CoreLib, never add the [UnsupportedOSPlatform("browser")] attribute. Rely on runtime checks (`ThrowIfNoThreadStart()`). In System.Threading.Thread ref assembly, always add the unsupported platform
attribute.  Add mismatches to ApiCompat baseline. In System.Threading.Thread.WebAssembly.Threading don't add the attributes, and also set DisablePackageBaselineValidation to prevent Restore from looking for a System.Threading.Thread.WebAssembly.Threading nuget (fixes in-tree ProjectReferences for testing)

* only turn on analyzers for the browser sample

   not all wasm samples

* Make a single Microsoft.NET.WebAssembly.Threading nupkg

   that holds all the special ref assemblies

* works: sample has ProjectReference to the Microsoft.NET.WebAssembly.Threading.proj

* Add System.Threading.ThreadPool.WebAssembly.Threading ref assembly

* ThreadPool: throw PNSE if no thread start

* Update wasm threads.md

* apicompat: correct warnings for System.Threading.ThreadPool

* Add dotnet.worker.js to the runtime pack; update PlatformManifestFileEntry

* [wasm] startup: detect Blazor dotnet.[version].[hash].js location

   Blazor injects a `<link rel="modulepreload" />` element into the header when it boots; detect it and extract the URL of the script.

   This is needed by Emscripten's dotnet.worker.js to run WorkerGlobalScope.importScripts

* one more fix to Microsoft.NET.WebAssembly.Threading

   Seems to be necessary in order for the resulting .nupkg not to reference non-existent nugets for the ProjectReferences

* rename sample to browser-mt-eventpipe

* bring back unmodified browser sample

   The multithreading sample is browser-mt-eventpipe

* update browser-mt-eventpipe sample to use ref assembly refs

   Referencing the rollup Microsoft.NET.WebAssembly.Threading.proj doesn't work (it ends up bundling the ref assemblies into the publish dir and breaking the app)

* Use correct ifdef in AppContext.AnyOS.cs

* [build] support WasmEnableThreads and WasmEnablePerfTracing

   These toplevel options either turn on multi-threading in general, or turn on multithreading only for eventpipe internals.

   For libraries these define `FeatureWasmThreads` and `FeatureWasmPerfTracing` properties and the `FEATURE_WASM_THREADS` and `FEATURE_WASM_PERFTRACING` compiler constants.

   For the native code, they control `DISABLE_THREADS` and `DISABLE_WASM_USER_THREADS` cmake and preprocessor settings.

* Only add the portable threadpool on wasm if threading is enabled

* rename browser-mt-eventpipe csproj and main assembly

   Give it a unique name distinct from Wasm.Browser.CJS.Sample.csproj

* fix /p:WasmEnableThreads=false build after merge

* now fix the WasmEnableThreads=true build

* we need two ThreadPoolBoundHandle implementation stubs

   one for PortableThreadPool when threads are enabled, one for single-threaded wasm

* Add a System.Diagnostics.Tracing ref assembly gated by FeatureWasmPerfTracing

* [eventpipe] use the correct cmake option name

   see src/mono/mono.proj

* revert debug printf and commented out code

* turn off additional logging

* hack: set FeatureWasmPerfTracing in the browser-mt-eventpipe sample

   It would be better to drive this (the inclusion of the tracing runtime component) from a user-visible flag. not the FeatureWasmPerfTracing implementation detail

* remove unused variable, remove unneeded configure checks, revert line damage; add better comment in export.ts

* Exclude Microsoft.NET.WebAssembly.Threading from testPackages.proj

* review feedback, Apply suggestions from code review

* Use a testPackages settings file to skip package runtime item verification

* remove unneeded Directory.Build.props for ref package

   since ti doesn't compile its own assembly, none of these properties are needed

* use one ProjectReference item to share metadata for the ref assemblies

* remove ProjectReference comment and NoTargetsDoNotReferenceOutputAssemblies prop

* Remove unneeded target

* packaging simplification

   - move `_ExperimentalUpdateFileVersion` target to packaging.targets, conditioned on a new `IsExperimentalRefAssembly` attribute.  (The target increments the file version of the ref assembly to make it easier to distinguish from the real non-experimental ref assembly)
   - Remove unneeded src subdirectories in ref assembly libraries
   - Move properties that are only used in the ref assembly projects directory into the projects and delete Directory.Build.props in the experimental ref assembly subdirectories.

* move and rename UpdateExperimentalRefAssemblyFileVersion target

   packages.targets is only included for IsPackable=true projects, and these ref assemblies are not packable.

* Assorted code review nits

* Don't build/pack the multi-threaded sample on single-threaded runtime

* remove gratuitous debug printfs

* Apply suggestions from code review

* merge followup: nullable is enabled by default now

* make eslint happy

* include wasm-config.h in wasm runtime host

* include wasm-config.h into the runtime pack

   fixes aot compilation

* Add wasm-config.h to manifest

* put wasm-config.h into include/wasm from the outset

* put back noExitRuntime replacement for CJS

Co-authored-by: Radek Doulik <radekdoulik@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Radek Doulik <radekdoulik@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Zoltan Varga <vargaz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Steve Pfister <steve.pfister@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Katelyn Gadd <kg@luminance.org>
Co-authored-by: Viktor Hofer <viktor.hofer@microsoft.com>
@radical radical modified the milestones: 7.0.0, 8.0.0 Aug 11, 2022
@TheXenocide
Copy link

Ooh, just came to check in on how things were going on the mono wasm side of this and came across this tracking issue. Nice to see this being tracked on the dotnet/runtime side now. It's good to see that the browser-wasm RID was the final answer on that particular design challenge, but I remember how much discussion there was about trying to avoid adding additional runtimes unnecessarily. Trying to make sense of the current state of these tickets, are we expecting that the browser-wasm runtime will be multi-purpose and have some convention for choosing subtypes, rather than defining new RIDs for multi-threaded and perf-trace package variants? Part of me feels like the multi-thread variant would be better served by its own RID if there are plans to support both (fundamentally different) runtimes for any extended period (e.g. reference assemblies/contracts can expose different supported surface areas at compile time rather than throwing runtime exceptions).

Is there a sense of how this will work for packaging and compile MSBuild conditions? It seems like WasmEnableThreads is rather narrow and probably only impacts the application build, not so much for libraries, NuGet packaging, etc. unless the desired result is for the compiler to be able to generate all variants automatically, but it seems like there would be significant design implications there, where performance and a variety of other factors would want to be able to provide different implementations for the different environments (e.g. concurrency-safe collection types could ignore concurrency without MT but might need to leverage platform-specific no-lock behaviors, etc.) Understandable if these aren't answered yet, just trying to get a sense of how these things intend to be differentiated by component developers between the runtime and consuming developers.

I ask here mainly because it seems there are multiple possible threads that seem appropriate. Feel free to move this comment or direct me where best to move the discussion. Otherwise, glad to see there's already some experimental support running now.

@sajjadarashhh
Copy link

what happend if this feature not support with browser?

@knight1219
Copy link

How, if any, effect for this have on Task based threading? If one creates multiple HttpClient.GetAsync tasks and schedules them using Task.WhenAll, will all tasks run in parallel on their own threads? Does each task need the ConfigureAwait(false) to be set?

If that is the case and you are sharing this code between Blazor WASM and Blazor Hybrid, are there any repercussions in MAUI by doing that?

@kg
Copy link
Member

kg commented Oct 12, 2022

Threading allows tasks to run on multiple threads, yes. Things that interact with browser APIs like HTTP are a more complex scenario, because browser APIs have thread affinity (think the nightmare of COM apartments, but worse)

@baywet
Copy link

baywet commented Nov 7, 2022

The Blazor needs to provide dotnet.worker.js as a js-module-threads asset list item probably needs its own issue for the following reasons:

  • to provide visibility to people (too me a while to find this post from the error message)
  • to clearly mention that blazor wasm apps won't be able to work currently without it
  • so it can be prioritized accordingly (lots of people on blazor wasm, they can't use the feature for the time being)

The error message for visibility

Assert failed: Can't find asset for js-module-threads
    at Us (dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:45132)
    at Object.Zs [as allocateUnusedWorker] (dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:52972)
    at Object.allocateUnusedWorker (dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:41466)
    at rs (dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:42820)
    at yu (dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:106551)
    at async dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:104732

Trying to poke around by finding dotnet.worker.js and copying it with the right name doesn't seem to be any use as the referencing code really expects it to be part of the bundle.

@danielpastoor
Copy link

The Blazor needs to provide dotnet.worker.js as a js-module-threads asset list item probably needs its own issue for the following reasons:

  • to provide visibility to people (too me a while to find this post from the error message)
  • to clearly mention that blazor wasm apps won't be able to work currently without it
  • so it can be prioritized accordingly (lots of people on blazor wasm, they can't use the feature for the time being)

The error message for visibility

Assert failed: Can't find asset for js-module-threads
    at Us (dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:45132)
    at Object.Zs [as allocateUnusedWorker] (dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:52972)
    at Object.allocateUnusedWorker (dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:41466)
    at rs (dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:42820)
    at yu (dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:106551)
    at async dotnet.7.0.0-rc.2.22472.3.9fl1sjtbvn.js:5:104732

Trying to poke around by finding dotnet.worker.js and copying it with the right name doesn't seem to be any use as the referencing code really expects it to be part of the bundle.

Have you found a tmp solution?

@baywet
Copy link

baywet commented Jan 23, 2023

I haven't, I was expecting the team here to revert with a workaround or a fix. I believe the key is hardcoded and I wasn't able to find extensibility points to impact the bundling process.

@czdietrich
Copy link

Any update on the js-module-threads issue?
It would be great to know how to work around this even if it currently needs manual steps.
So we could gather experience with the multithreading environment in Blazor in early development phases.

@lambdageek
Copy link
Member Author

Are threads and JSImports meant to be working, or do I need to wait for another .NET release?

Edit: looks like I need to wait for #84489.

That's exactly right. It's not supported yet, but I'm working on it.

I'm curious to know more about your use case.

Note that with #84489, only threads started with Task.Run will be able to JSImport async functions that return promises.

Just starting a thread with new Thread() and calling some JSImported promise and then calling .Wait() or .Result won't be supported (those synchronous blocking wait/result calls preventnus from returning to the JS event loop in the webworker, so JS promises never get a chance to resolve).

@curiousdannii
Copy link

curiousdannii commented Apr 22, 2023

I'm curious to know more about your use case.

I have an app I'm trying to port, which calls a blocking function in a non-managed dll:

        [DllImport("Glk")]
        internal static extern void glk_select(ref Event ev);

To port it to WASM/JS it instead needs to call an async JS function (ignore that it no longer takes any arguments):

        [JSImport("glk_select", "main.js")]
        internal static partial Task glk_select();

I've made an interface that lets me link to either the DLL or the JSImport, but I just need some way to block while I wait for the promise to resolve. And that's pretty much it!

(I also tried making the app async, but it's a messy legacy app and I would end up needing convert nearly everything to async functions, so threads seems a better option.) (And async functions not having ref or out arguments and VB.net not having tuple destructuring makes it even grosser to try to convert.)

@ArcadeMode
Copy link

Any update on the js-module-threads issue? It would be great to know how to work around this even if it currently needs manual steps. So we could gather experience with the multithreading environment in Blazor in early development phases.

Any news on this? I'm still seeing this today, not sure how to work around it.

@lambdageek
Copy link
Member Author

Any update on the js-module-threads issue? It would be great to know how to work around this even if it currently needs manual steps. So we could gather experience with the multithreading environment in Blazor in early development phases.

Any news on this? I'm still seeing this today, not sure how to work around it.

Unfortunately Blazor support for threading is taking a bit longer than we would have liked. We're working on it, but it's not something that you can experiment with at this point. We do expect to have something in a later .NET 8 preview.

@ArcadeMode
Copy link

Unfortunately Blazor support for threading is taking a bit longer than we would have liked. We're working on it, but it's not something that you can experiment with at this point. We do expect to have something in a later .NET 8 preview.

Thats a shame, thank you for your reply 😊

@pavelsavara
Copy link
Member

I updated MT tracking issue #85592

@tebeco
Copy link

tebeco commented Jan 12, 2024

hello,

Anyone know if this meta tracker could updated for net8 ? now that the release is done ?
I've seen a question on the C# Discord server, search engine found this issue as the first search result, but I can't seems to tell what changed from net7 to net8 from this tracker

image

@pavelsavara
Copy link
Member

Anyone know if this meta tracker could updated for net8 ?

There were mostly low level steps toward multi-threading during Net8, but it's not supported in Net8.
For the current progress on Net9, please have look at #85592

@tebeco
Copy link

tebeco commented Jan 29, 2024

Anyone know if this meta tracker could updated for net8 ?

There were mostly low level steps toward multi-threading during Net8, but it's not supported in Net8. For the current progress on Net9, please have look at #85592

Ah cool, thx a lot for the next release tracker :)


image

This image is why I asked,
It was usefully showing net7.0 - RC2
and also showing net9.0 milestone, but is missing anything related net8.0 that being ultra small or bigger type of release

Now i understand that there's another one regarding Net9.0

The question is ... from an outsider point of you it would be nice to have this issue either

  • renamed to clarify it's only net7 (probably not the case)
  • closed if all done (probably not the case)
  • updated every release (ie: net8.0: list of PR)
  • list all possible tracker per release and each release issue summing it

I'm not trying to be picky, I'm just hardly able to try to follow up cross release "Epic size" feature when there's a lot of cross over that are not listed.
There's probably other ways i suppose but this ticket title seems like the perfect candidate to list the "per release"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arch-wasm WebAssembly architecture area-VM-threading-mono os-browser Browser variant of arch-wasm tracking This issue is tracking the completion of other related issues.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests