Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[mono][swift-interop] Support for Swift frozen struct lowering in mini-JIT/AOT/interpreter #102143
[mono][swift-interop] Support for Swift frozen struct lowering in mini-JIT/AOT/interpreter #102143
Changes from all commits
d664b69
b305cb3
2764076
5294446
91a5e7a
49d5afb
b564238
96a6fd3
ba829c8
241765b
0638729
2376d05
f0e8da4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The argument moving around that happens here will break the fast offset allocator (where we allocate storage for vars immediately as we push it on the
td->sp
stack). This appears however to be fine because we disable tiering for wrappers and I would imagine a swift call is only happening from a m2n wrapper. However I would assert here thattd->optimized
with the comment that argument reordering here doesn't handle on the fly offset allocation and requires the full var offset allocator pass that is only ran for optimized code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we only need to perform the struct lowering for m2n (and later eventually n2m) wrappers. I added the assert with the comment you suggested.