Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0-rc2] Update dependencies from dotnet/emsdk #107935

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/emsdk

  • Subscription: 53d09050-52e4-48e3-97c8-3e76551acda2
  • Build: 20240916.4
  • Date Produced: September 16, 2024 6:19:30 PM UTC
  • Commit: c3d83d0ea894e5ee537bfc591fd48e06af8d9166
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/9.0-rc2

…16.4

Microsoft.SourceBuild.Intermediate.emsdk , Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-9.0.100.Transport
 From Version 9.0.0-rc.2.24464.3 -> To Version 9.0.0-rc.2.24466.4
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow label Sep 17, 2024
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 17, 2024
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

cc @lewing for 👀 as this might show similar failures as the PR targeting release/9.0: #107917

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 17, 2024

@carlossanlop this one is empty (and fine) the other we're working on for rtm

@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit 7688892 into release/9.0-rc2 Sep 17, 2024
158 of 167 checks passed
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the darc-release/9.0-rc2-cf14df23-91bc-427d-b3d3-c0286dc6e673 branch September 17, 2024 23:09
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants