JIT: fix case where implied subrange assertions can get lost in morph #112020
Conversation
If a method used short bit vectors during morph, modifications to the assertion set were being made to a copy, not to the original. Also, restrict implied boolean subrange assertions to integer vars.
dotnet-issue-labeler
bot
added
the
area-CodeGen-coreclr
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch |
|
@EgorBo PTAL Follow up from some things I noticed here #111980 (comment) Some diffs in small methods. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Our guidelines dislike non-constant reference arguments https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/docs/coding-guidelines/clr-jit-coding-conventions.md#1535-reference-arguments but looks like we do it in a quite a few places
|
Once this goes in I will experiment with expanding the implied assertion set. |
Also not a big fan of using typedefs to hide implementation details, |
|
Failures all look like infra issues so far. |
* main: JIT: fix case where implied subrange assertions can get lost in morph (dotnet#112020) Propose new async API (dotnet#110420) Move the diagnostic print for stack overflow test failure (dotnet#112001) JIT: Fold more nullchecks (dotnet#111985) Baseline more pri1 tests (dotnet#111068)
If a method used short bit vectors during morph, modifications to the assertion set were being made to a copy, not to the original.
Also, restrict implied boolean subrange assertions to integer vars.