Fix StackOverflowException serializing dictionary with string key and object-converter that handles string #122835
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
main PR
Description
When a
CastingConverter<T>wraps a source converter whoseTypedoesn't matchT(e.g.,CastingConverter<string>wrappingJsonConverter<object>), property name serialization causes infinite recursion:CastingConverter<string>.WriteAsPropertyNameCore→ source converterWriteAsPropertyNamegets fallback for typeobject→ObjectConverterObjectConverterlooks up converter for runtime typestring→ returns sameCastingConverter<string>Fix: In
CastingConverter, check if_sourceConverter.Type == typeof(T)before delegating property name methods. If they differ, use base class logic which correctly resolves fallback for typeT.Customer Impact
Users with custom
JsonConverter<object>converters that handle specific types viaCanConvertwill hit StackOverflowException when serializing dictionaries with keys of those types.Regression
No - this is a pre-existing issue.
Testing
ObjectConverterHandlingStrings_DictionaryWithStringKey_DoesNotCauseStackOverflowRisk
Low. The fix adds a type equality check before delegation. If types match, behavior is unchanged. If they differ, we use the base class fallback path which is already well-tested.
Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.
Original prompt