Adds Console Log Formatting APIs

[maryamariyan]

• APIs approved from issue: Flexible and efficient optionally-structured console logging out of the box #34742
• Apply API review feedback
• Add implementation for the APIs.
• Updated ConsoleLoggerTests -> contains existing test cases (supporting deprecated workflow and using obsolete APIs to ensure 3.1 workflow is not regressed.)
• minor styling bugfixes (e.g. exception log did not have proper padding on Default format)
• The Log workflow would handle VT100 parsing for basic cases only. The parser ignores the escape codes we don't support. When a full parser is implemented later in the BCL, we'll switch the logger code to use that one instead
• add new test cases

[Dotnet-GitSync-Bot]

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

[tarekgh]

@maryamariyan I'll wait till the design review occur and then will review this PR.

CC @davidfowl

[tarekgh]

ObsoleteAttribute [](start = 12, length = 17)

Do we need to file and fill the breaking change template for such changes?

[terrajobst]

I'd say we don't. @PriyaPurkayastha?

[PriyaPurkayastha]

We actually do document APIs marked obsolete as a breaking change using https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/new?template=dotnet-breaking-change.md.
You can look up https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/compatibility/aspnetcore for examples.

[maryamariyan]

• TODO

[maryamariyan]

/cc: @shirhatti

[jkotas]

Was CI green on this before this was merged? I am seeing failures introduced by this change in number of PRs.

[maryamariyan]

yes. it was green and I did a rebase to resolve a conflict on ConsoleLoggerTest

[maryamariyan]

this git page is incorrectly saying 168 files were changed, but it is actually 47 files: see 69d98ee

[safern]

Was CI green on this before this was merged? I am seeing failures introduced by this change in number of PRs.

I'm investigating the failure and I believe this is because of: #39209

kernel32.dll shouldn't come into play in OSX nor Linux and Linux and OSX test runs are failing with:

Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.HostTests.CreateDefaultBuilder_IncludesContentRootByDefault [FAIL]
      System.DllNotFoundException : Unable to load shared library 'kernel32.dll' or one of its dependencies. In order to help diagnose loading problems, consider setting the DYLD_PRINT_LIBRARIES environment variable: dlopen(libkernel32.dll, 1): image not found
      Stack Trace:
           at Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console.ConsoleLoggerProvider.DoesConsoleSupportAnsi()
        /_/src/libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console/src/ConsoleLoggerProvider.cs(50,0): at Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console.ConsoleLoggerProvider..ctor(IOptionsMonitor`1 options, IEnumerable`1 formatters)

I'm doing a run without #39209