Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport docs for System.Numerics.Vectors #47725

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Feb 12, 2021

Conversation

carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

@carlossanlop carlossanlop commented Feb 1, 2021

Backporting public API documentation from MS Docs into triple slash comments for the System.Numerics.Vectors namespace.

This namespace was interesting for this experiment because all the source files live in System.Private.CoreLib, so the porting tool had to make sure to read the System.Numerics.Vectors.csproj dependent projects and find the source code files in them.

The full description of the purpose of this PR is described in the issue #44969 - Pilot a new process that extracts API documentation from source code under the section "Bring documentation from Docs to triple slash".

I ran the porting tool using this command:

DocsPortingTool.exe \
-CsProj D:\runtime\src\libraries\System.Numerics.Vectors\src\System.Numerics.Vectors.csproj \
-Docs D:\dotnet-api-docs\xml \
-Save true \
-Direction ToTripleSlash \
-IncludedAssemblies System.Numerics \
-IncludedNamespaces System.Numerics

Please compare the ported docs with their source files in dotnet-api-docs:
https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet-api-docs/tree/master/xml/System.Numerics

@carlossanlop carlossanlop added documentation Documentation bug or enhancement, does not impact product or test code area-System.Numerics labels Feb 1, 2021
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Feb 1, 2021
@carlossanlop carlossanlop self-assigned this Feb 1, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 1, 2021

Tagging subscribers to this area: @tannergooding, @pgovind
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backporting public API documentation from MS Docs into triple slash comments for the System.Numerics.Vectors namespace.

This namespace was interesting for this experiment because all the source files live in System.Private.CoreLib, so the porting tool had to make sure to read the System.Numerics.Vectors.csproj dependent projects and find the source code files in them.

The full description of the purpose of this PR is described in the issue #44969 - Pilot a new process that extracts API documentation from source code under the section "Bring documentation from Docs to triple slash".

I ran the porting tool using this command:

DocsPortingTool.exe \
-CsProj D:\runtime\src\libraries\System.Numerics.Vectors\src\System.Numerics.Vectors.csproj \
-Docs D:\dotnet-api-docs\xml \
-Save true \
-Direction ToTripleSlash \
-IncludedAssemblies System.Numerics \
-IncludedNamespaces System.Numerics
Author: carlossanlop
Assignees: carlossanlop
Labels:

area-System.Numerics, documentation

Milestone: 6.0.0

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member Author

carlossanlop commented Feb 1, 2021

Need to refresh this branch. There are some recent nullability changes causing a conflict.
Edit: Fixed with a force push below.

@@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
Microsoft Visual Studio Solution File, Format Version 12.00
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess these changes to the sln file are not intentional?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Visual Studio made those changes automatically (first commit in the PR).

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these changes occur when a newer version of VS opens the sln. AFAIK, reverting these changes work, so that's what I've always done.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's kind of annoying having to revert the changes every time I have to submit a new commit. @safern would I break something if I keep the sln changes?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll keep this unless it causes any issues.

@safern
Copy link
Member

safern commented Feb 1, 2021

This namespace was interesting for this experiment because all the source files live in System.Private.CoreLib, so the porting tool had to make sure to read the System.Numerics.Vectors.csproj dependent projects and find the source code files in them.

For implementation that lives in System.Private.CoreLib, we should run the tool with RuntimeFlavor=Mono so that specific API that is exposed via the Mono S.P.CoreLib if any, gets it's docs ported.

@carlossanlop carlossanlop requested a review from gewarren February 2, 2021 21:32
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@

namespace System.Numerics
{
/// <summary>A structure encapsulating a 3x2 matrix.</summary>
/// <summary>Represents a 3x2 matrix.</summary>
/// <remarks>[!INCLUDE[vectors-are-rows-paragraph](~/includes/system-numerics-vectors-are-rows.md)]</remarks>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not 100% sure if the INCLUDE syntax works in non-Markdown sections.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gewarren that's a good point. In the first PR, I was asked to remove the CDATA since it was not providing any value in triple slash comments, was using a lot of unnecessary space and polluting the code visually.

So I have a question for you to help address this: When we send intellisense xmls to the Docs build system, is it smart enough to automatically wrap non-empty remarks (including remarks that say To be added.) with these tags?:

<format type="text/markdown><![CDATA[ ... ]]></format>

If not, then we have two options:

A) Convert markdown links like these to valid xml. Do you know what's the non-markdown syntax for a link to an md file? And do you know if the Docs build system will be able to read that correctly and render the md document properly?
B) Talk to the Docs dev team to request converting any remarks we send to them to markdown (if they don't do it yet).

Thoughts?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another thing to consider is that the xmls that Roslyn will produce after the source of truth are comments in source code, we will be shipping that as part of the intellisense xml files right? How will this look when a customer hovers over an API on VS and VS takes the info for that API from comments with these includes or [CDATA]?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAIK, remarks do not show up in VS intellisense in any way.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you know what's the non-markdown syntax for a link to an md file?

I don't know. And the thing is, you don't just want a link, you actually want to import the contents of the linked file.

When we send intellisense xmls to the Docs build system, is it smart enough to automatically wrap non-empty remarks?

No, it does not. See for example here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gewarren to address this problem, we can keep the CDATA section for remarks that require to show an include.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/// <returns>The product matrix.</returns>
/// <remarks>The <see cref="System.Numerics.Matrix3x2.op_Multiply" /> method defines the operation of the multiplication operator for <see cref="System.Numerics.Matrix3x2" /> objects.</remarks>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The crefs need to be prefixed with a P: for property, M: for method, etc. If this reference is referring to both overloads of the * operator, then I think the prefix is Overload:.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't C# add these automatically? If not should it be updated to do so?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's even a code analysis rule that enforces not setting a prefix - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fundamentals/code-analysis/quality-rules/ca1200.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gewarren There is a bug preventing me from indicating a method group in triple slash comments (the equivalent of Overload: as you mentioned). There is an open issue tracking this problem in the csharplang repo: dotnet/csharplang#320

Would you mind helping me increase the priority/visibility of the csharplang issue? I am currently running the tool in other larger assemblies, and this is going to become a very common problem when porting types with lots of overloads (Process, FileStream are giving me a headache).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done!

@@ -8,28 +8,32 @@
namespace System.Numerics
{
/// <summary>Represents a vector that is used to encode three-dimensional physical rotations.</summary>
/// <remarks>The <see cref="System.Numerics.Quaternion" /> structure is used to efficiently rotate an object about the (x,y,z) vector by the angle theta, where:
/// ```
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure about using ``` in XML. Also, it should have a code language.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch. These are the cases that we need to manually move to a file in dotnet-api-docs, then link to it here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found a bunch of these and I have converted them either to remarks with format + cdata, or to <c></c>.

@carlossanlop carlossanlop marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2021 04:59
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member Author

@gewarren @tannergooding @pgovind I marked this draft as ready for review. I addressed all your comments and suggestions and made sure the remarks with special markdown data show their information properly. Can you please take a look?

{875DAA4F-1BC0-4EE2-9A04-EDD2FC5C773F} = {7A13467C-8469-4562-B00F-C4D61E8A1855}
{BD5C16FE-CAAA-45CB-91F3-C66A2493C518} = {7A13467C-8469-4562-B00F-C4D61E8A1855}
GlobalSection(SharedMSBuildProjectFiles) = preSolution
..\System.Private.CoreLib\src\System.Private.CoreLib.Shared.projitems*{634a3b2b-09f5-4810-b630-ade4d36c47df}*SharedItemsImports = 5
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand why this is being added? Did you change this on VS?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, I didn't modify the sln file myself. Visual Studio did this. I'll revert the sln file change.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@safern reverted.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member Author

Learnings from this PR:

  • Overloads can't be shown in triple slash comments. This is a bug, and it is tracked by Ability to reference a method group in XML comment csharplang#320 .
  • When remarks contain a hyperlink or an include to an example, the whole element needs to be transformed to markdown (wrapped by <format type="text/markdown"><![CDATA[ ... ]]></format>).

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member Author

carlossanlop commented Feb 12, 2021

The two CI failures are unrelated to my change. I already tried re-running both legs 4 times and the failure is consistent.

The Libraries Test Run release coreclr windows x64 Debug CI leg is failing with this:

ERROR: helix-scripts 20191204.1 has requirement azure-core==1.0.0, but you'll have azure-core 1.7.0 which is incompatible.
ERROR: helix-scripts 20191204.1 has requirement azure-storage-blob==12.0.0, but you'll have azure-storage-blob 12.5.0 which is incompatible.
ERROR: helix-scripts 20191204.1 has requirement certifi==2018.11.29, but you'll have certifi 2020.6.20 which is incompatible.

And the Installer Build and Test coreclr windows_x64 Release CI leg with this:

D:\workspace\_work\1\s\.packages\microsoft.dotnet.sharedframework.sdk\6.0.0-beta.21105.5\targets\sharedfx.targets(273,5): error : The following files are missing entries in the templated manifest: [D:\workspace\_work\1\s\src\installer\pkg\sfx\Microsoft.NETCore.App\Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.sfxproj]
D:\workspace\_work\1\s\.packages\microsoft.dotnet.sharedframework.sdk\6.0.0-beta.21105.5\targets\sharedfx.targets(273,5): error : pgort140.dll. Add these file names with extensions to the 'PlatformManifestFileEntry' item group for the runtime pack and corresponding ref pack to include them in the platform manifest. [D:\workspace\_work\1\s\src\installer\pkg\sfx\Microsoft.NETCore.App\Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.sfxproj]
##[error].packages\microsoft.dotnet.sharedframework.sdk\6.0.0-beta.21105.5\targets\sharedfx.targets(273,5): error : (NETCORE_ENGINEERING_TELEMETRY=Build) The following files are missing entries in the templated manifest:
pgort140.dll. Add these file names with extensions to the 'PlatformManifestFileEntry' item group for the runtime pack and corresponding ref pack to include them in the platform manifest.

Build FAILED.

@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit adf616b into dotnet:master Feb 12, 2021
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the NumericsVectorsBackport branch February 12, 2021 05:30
@carlossanlop carlossanlop linked an issue Mar 2, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 14, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-System.Numerics documentation Documentation bug or enhancement, does not impact product or test code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

System.Numerics: Backport MS Docs documentation to triple slash
6 participants