-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix GC hole on arm32 #50759
Merged
+51
−5
Merged
Fix GC hole on arm32 #50759
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: maybe
void Lowering::CheckNode(Compiler* compiler, GenTree* node)
is a better place for such check:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm worried about moving the assert to
CheckNode
:Comments?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are adding "tracked" before Lowering and "contained" during Lowering, so after Lowering both should be stable (there is one exception for of
ClearContained
for bitcast but it is not important here)I was thinking about adding something like:
to
Lowering::CheckNode
.would not it be enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That doesn't work. There are cases where the LCL_VAR_ADDR is a not required to be contained. I see such a case with
STORE_OBJ(LCL_VAR_ADDR, LCL_VAR)
. I also seeSTOREIND-simd12(LCL_FLD_ADDR, LCLVAR-simd16)
.If I add
|| !varTypeIsGC(varDsc)
that's still not enough, as I see cases where we have not-contained tracked address loads, which is fine becausegenCodeForLclAddr
does the right liveness updates for uses. The issue is for stores. So, I'd need to look at the context (parent node). And it's not clear that just STOREIND is necessary to check.Bottom-line: does this change really need this more general assert in a common location? Or can I leave it as-is?