Fix S.R.InteropServices remarks #71683
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
carlossanlop
requested review from
jkoritzinsky,
gewarren,
AaronRobinsonMSFT and
elinor-fung
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/interop-contrib Issue DetailsIn the latest documentation porting PR, I had to manually pull out the isolated The I am doing this in source too so that the next porting processes do not port the wrong remarks again.
|
AaronRobinsonMSFT
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2022
jkoritzinsky
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2022
elinor-fung
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2022
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the latest documentation porting PR, I had to manually pull out the isolated
<seealso>items from the remarks section, otherwise they would show in a confusing way in MS Docs.The
<seealso>items can be added without problems at the same level as the rest of the usual comment items.I am doing this in source too so that the next porting processes do not port the wrong remarks again.