Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/7.0] Unpin the C# compiler version #81247

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 11, 2023

Conversation

jkoritzinsky
Copy link
Member

Fixes Issue #65317

Description

Unpin the C# compiler and build our shipping Roslyn components against the released Roslyn components for 7.0.100 instead of against pre-release builds.

Also rename the MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion_4_X property now that it's pinned to Roslyn 4.4 forever.

Customer Impact

This is an infrastructure PR to ensure we can pick up servicing fixes from the compiler easily and build against release bits.

Regression

N/A

Testing

Risk

Minimal risk

Package authoring signed off?

Package authoring reviewers tagged.

IMPORTANT: If this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Unpin the C# compiler and build our shipping Roslyn components against the released Roslyn components for 7.0.100 instead of against pre-release builds.

Also rename the MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion_4_X property now that it's pinned to Roslyn 4.4 forever.

Fixes dotnet#65317
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky added Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review area-Infrastructure labels Jan 26, 2023
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky added this to the 7.0.x milestone Jan 26, 2023
@ghost ghost assigned jkoritzinsky Jan 26, 2023
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky changed the title Unpin the C# compiler version [release/7.0] Unpin the C# compiler version Jan 26, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 26, 2023

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Fixes Issue #65317

Description

Unpin the C# compiler and build our shipping Roslyn components against the released Roslyn components for 7.0.100 instead of against pre-release builds.

Also rename the MicrosoftCodeAnalysisVersion_4_X property now that it's pinned to Roslyn 4.4 forever.

Customer Impact

This is an infrastructure PR to ensure we can pick up servicing fixes from the compiler easily and build against release bits.

Regression

N/A

Testing

Risk

Minimal risk

Package authoring signed off?

Package authoring reviewers tagged.

IMPORTANT: If this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author: jkoritzinsky
Assignees: -
Labels:

Servicing-consider, area-Infrastructure

Milestone: 7.0.x

Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we can follow the tell mode process.

Is this blocking?

Adding @carlossanlop to help with when we can merge.

@jkoritzinsky
Copy link
Member Author

As mentioned offline, this is not blocking. This is infrastructure cleanup. The issue was marked as "blocking-servicing" to ensure we wouldn't lose it in our list of issues and would address it quickly after 7.0 was released.

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT removed the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Jan 31, 2023
@carlossanlop carlossanlop modified the milestones: 7.0.x, 7.0.4 Feb 10, 2023
@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit a1136a9 into dotnet:release/7.0 Feb 11, 2023
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 13, 2023
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky deleted the unpin-roslyn-7.0 branch April 21, 2023 17:54
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants