-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP #83873
Closed
BruceForstall
wants to merge
17
commits into
dotnet:main
from
BruceForstall:tannergooding_evex_disableavx512f
Closed
WIP #83873
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bdce1f4
Remove JitForceEVEXEncoding in favor of the existing AltJit enablement
tannergooding 30f54f1
Rename IsVexEncodingInstruction to IsVexEncodableInstruction
tannergooding 63ccbb5
Updating the JIT to support EVEX by default
tannergooding 1db8c9a
Mark the AVX512 ISAs as "fully implemented" since they have no unimpl…
tannergooding 15a0755
Simplify some of the EVEX related checks in emitxarch
tannergooding 56f27aa
Tweak the Vector512 ISA check to properly account for VL
tannergooding d8f9ef7
Applying formatting patch
tannergooding 0974171
Ensure we're checking for actual KMask usage and not just potential u…
tannergooding 2328f46
Fixing CORJIT_ALLOCMEM_FLG_RODATA_64BYTE_ALIGN for the managed VM
tannergooding 081516d
Fixing the DoJitStressEvexEncoding check to account for VEX vs EVEX d…
tannergooding 9e780f8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'dotnet/main' into evex
tannergooding 222e972
Break apart an overly long assert
tannergooding 0b9dbb3
Ensure IsBaselineVector512IsaSupported works on x86
tannergooding 9dfbd7f
Block NI_Vector512_ExtractMostSignificantBits on x86 pending decompos…
tannergooding 1f6fa3d
Ensure we don't overwrite 64-byte alignment for SPMI
tannergooding b713f69
Include Vector512 HWIntrinsic tests by default
tannergooding 5dbbc05
WIP
BruceForstall File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't going to change the SPMI numbers because this is a VM flag, so the ISAs reported as supported from the SPMI VM cache won't change. It does change the results for real runs, however.
If you want to see the results in SPMI, you need an additional JIT side tweak; as elaborated on here: #83648 (comment)
The plan would be for me to do the work, in a follow up PR, to allow the JIT versions of these flags (defined here: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/coreclr/jit/jitconfigvalues.h#L321-L328) to not only be used by the AltJIT to enable otherwise unsupported ISAs, but to also be used by scenarios like SPMI to disable ISAs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, I realized this based on the other issue conversation. I do like the idea of exposing the flags for SPMI usage.