Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/6.0] Suppress clang-16 warnings (backport #81573) #84443

Conversation

ayakael
Copy link
Contributor

@ayakael ayakael commented Apr 6, 2023

Backports #81573 and #82461

Customer impact

Without this, .NET 6 fails to build on platforms that use clang-16

Testing

Tested on CI and manually on Alpine Linux edge.

Risk

Low. The flag that is set makes the compiler less strict.

@am11 @omajid ptal.

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 6, 2023
@ghost ghost added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Apr 6, 2023
@am11
Copy link
Member

am11 commented Apr 6, 2023

Backport #82461 at the same time?

@ayakael ayakael force-pushed the backport/pr-81573-to-release/6.0 branch from 8a26995 to a6d9fbf Compare April 6, 2023 20:40
@ayakael ayakael force-pushed the backport/pr-81573-to-release/6.0 branch from a6d9fbf to db09bc2 Compare April 6, 2023 21:10
@ayakael ayakael changed the base branch from release/6.0 to release/6.0-staging April 6, 2023 21:10
@ayakael ayakael changed the title [release/6.0] Suppress clang-16 warnings (backport #81573) [release/6.0-staging] Suppress clang-16 warnings (backport #81573) Apr 6, 2023
@ayakael ayakael changed the title [release/6.0-staging] Suppress clang-16 warnings (backport #81573) [release/6.0] Suppress clang-16 warnings (backport #81573) Apr 6, 2023
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

cc @tommcdon (see #84444 (comment))

@jeffhandley jeffhandley added area-Infrastructure and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Apr 11, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 11, 2023

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backports #81573 and #82461

Customer impact

Without this, .NET 6 fails to build on platforms that use clang-16

Testing

Tested on CI and manually on Alpine Linux edge.

Risk

Low. The flag that is set makes the compiler less strict.

@am11 @omajid ptal.

Author: ayakael
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-Infrastructure, community-contribution

Milestone: -

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

carlossanlop commented May 4, 2023

@mikem8361, @hoyosjs - if we want this change in the June Release, and it looks ready, please merge before May 15th (Code Complete).

@am11
Copy link
Member

am11 commented May 4, 2023

Failures look related.

@ghost ghost added the needs-author-action An issue or pull request that requires more info or actions from the author. label May 5, 2023
@ayakael ayakael force-pushed the backport/pr-81573-to-release/6.0 branch from db09bc2 to ac85caf Compare May 5, 2023 04:31
@ghost ghost removed the needs-author-action An issue or pull request that requires more info or actions from the author. label May 5, 2023
@akoeplinger
Copy link
Member

Failures look unrelated to me now.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

Today is code complete for the June Release. @hoyosjs @akoeplinger is this ready to merge? @hoyosjs you have a blocking review.

@akoeplinger
Copy link
Member

@carlossanlop this is ready 👍

@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label May 15, 2023
@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit 2f007ae into dotnet:release/6.0-staging May 15, 2023
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 15, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-Infrastructure community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants