[RISC-V] Fix ProcessWaitingTests.WaitChain and ProcessWaitingTests.Wa…

[yurai007]

…itAsyncChain

Since WaitChain and WaitAsyncChain test cases perform quadruple nested chain of corerun invocation, and rely on execution time, they are pretty sensitive to corerun startup time. On RISC-V we experience test failures due to the fact that WaitInMS timeout is too aggressive for Checked and Debug builds in the case of R2R absence. It seems that without System.Private.CoreLib R2R artifacts CoreCLR need to jit 2x-3x more functions (Checked build). We think it's reasonable to expect tests working even in case of lack of R2R. This change fixes mentioned test cases by bumping waiting timeouts for RISC-V architecture.

Part of #84834
cc @wscho77 @HJLeee @clamp03 @JongHeonChoi @t-mustafin @gbalykov @ashaurtaev @sirntar @tomeksowi @Bajtazar @viewizard

[ghost]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-diagnostics-process
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

---

…itAsyncChain

Since WaitChain and WaitAsyncChain test cases perform quadruple nested chain of corerun invocation, and rely on execution time, they are pretty sensitive to corerun startup time. On RISC-V we experience test failures due to the fact that WaitInMS timeout is too aggressive for Checked and Debug builds in the case of R2R absence. It seems that without System.Private.CoreLib R2R artifacts CoreCLR need to jit 2x-3x more functions (Checked build). We think it's reasonable to expect tests working even in case of lack of R2R. Also this assumption would make sense for other platforms, not only RISC-V. This change fixes mentioned test cases by bumping waiting timeouts.

Part of #84834
cc @wscho77 @HJLeee @clamp03 @JongHeonChoi @t-mustafin @gbalykov @ashaurtaev @sirntar @tomeksowi @Bajtazar @viewizard

Author:	yurai007
Assignees:	-
Labels:	area-System.Diagnostics.Process, community-contribution
Milestone:	-

[adamsitnik]

Thank you for sharing the findings of your detailed investigation.

I am supportive of the direction, but I think that the fix can be improved, PTAL at my comment.

Thanks!

[yurai007]

Updated PR description and poked CI again.

[clamp03]

LGTM. Please do not force-push.

[adamsitnik]

LGTM, Thank you @yurai007 !