-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JIT: Establish loop invariant base case based on IR #97182
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9fc3436
JIT: Establish loop invariant base case based on IR
jakobbotsch 1e1bfe7
Fix build
jakobbotsch 0603636
Merge branch 'main' into check-loop-inversion-IR
jakobbotsch 1c302fc
Merge branch 'main' into check-loop-inversion-IR
jakobbotsch a7ca60a
Address feedback, check limit equality
jakobbotsch 67f2ae4
Nit
jakobbotsch 5115ace
Merge branch 'main' into check-loop-inversion-IR
jakobbotsch File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is handling a preheader, can you add a comment? Can do this in a follow-up.
Also we'd expect that
entering
isBBJ_ALWAYS
The check in
optExtractInitTestIncr
is still usingbbFallsThrough
so I wonder if we're missing some cases from that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Currently
FlowGraphNaturalLoop::AnalyzeIteration
is general enough to be used before preheaders have been created. We don't actually use it during that, but still I kept this similarly general (and matchingoptExtractInitTestIncr
).We could probably clean up these two methods at the same time. I agree we should also generalize
optExtractInitTestIncr
, in particular to handle loops we did not invert. We could also consider using dominators to try harder to prove the "loop invariant" to be true when initially entered, since I think we usually have them available in the places that callFlowGraphNaturalLoop::AnalyzeIteration
, so we could do something similar to RBO here.I'll add a comment. I also just noticed that I forgot the equality check on the limits, so need to add that too.