-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vectorized GetNonRandomizedHashCode
#98838
Closed
Closed
Changes from 16 commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a108bef
Improve the performance for GetNonRandomizedHashCode
Ruihan-Yin 8e38b51
Improve the performance for GetNonRandomizedHashCode
Ruihan-Yin fffaa7a
Ensure all the strings are hashed on the same path when SSE is availa…
Ruihan-Yin e8c723c
bug fix attempt
Ruihan-Yin 535a890
bug fix attempt
Ruihan-Yin ded022e
bug fix attempt
Ruihan-Yin 1d20ede
bug fix attempt
Ruihan-Yin ac9ed6c
Try to make the vector path and scalar path output the same result.
Ruihan-Yin 3507cf3
Remove unnecessary assertion
Ruihan-Yin 0253b00
Fix bad naming and infinite loop
Ruihan-Yin f3b1fcc
Bug fix:
Ruihan-Yin e82ff0a
resolve comments
Ruihan-Yin e2f7f37
make the expected collision point to be properly represented by int
Ruihan-Yin caccc70
update test code, ensure to get the correct collision point
Ruihan-Yin 3faabaa
bug fix
Ruihan-Yin 110a29e
bug fix
Ruihan-Yin 545bdba
update the assert check.
Ruihan-Yin c9a9b62
Resolve comments.
Ruihan-Yin e20d484
Update with suggested changes from the review.
Ruihan-Yin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure why you have changed this to
while
loop. I thinkif
was perfectly fine here and more efficient too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The original main loop processes the data stream in the way:
There will be an extra iteration when length is 4n-3, e.g. 7. consuming an extra null terminator, and it also leaves the fact that the trailing string length can only 0/1/2, so it can be processed by the following
if
statement.While in the updated case, since the main loop is operating on a larger granularity, the same trick might violate the memory beyond the null terminator. So I used
while
here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can the condition in the main while loop be
while (length >= 8)
and the checkif (length >= 4)
?I understand that the existing code does tricks with the null terminator to save a few instructions. You do not have to match those tricks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, thanks for the suggestion, I can try that.