-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature band fallback with workload update #24678
Feature band fallback with workload update #24678
Conversation
src/Tests/dotnet-workload-install.Tests/GivenWorkloadManifestUpdater.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Cli/dotnet/commands/dotnet-workload/install/WorkloadManifestUpdater.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Cli/dotnet/commands/dotnet-workload/install/WorkloadManifestUpdater.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…b.com/gkulin/sdk into featureBandFallbackWithWorkloadUpdate
@@ -366,6 +366,8 @@ public void ApplyRollbackAcrossFeatureBand(string existingSdkFeatureBand, string | |||
packInstaller.InstalledManifests[0].manifestUpdate.ManifestId.Should().Be(manifestsToUpdate[0].manifestUpdate.ManifestId); | |||
packInstaller.InstalledManifests[0].manifestUpdate.NewVersion.Should().Be(manifestsToUpdate[0].manifestUpdate.NewVersion); | |||
packInstaller.InstalledManifests[0].manifestUpdate.NewFeatureBand.Should().Be(manifestsToUpdate[0].manifestUpdate.NewFeatureBand); | |||
packInstaller.InstalledManifests[0].manifestUpdate.ExistingVersion.Should().Be(manifestsToUpdate[0].manifestUpdate.ExistingVersion); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question: Before the change, were these values not set, or did they have different values?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These values were introduced in this PR from Daniel: #24630
If I remember correctly, Daniel asked me to add these checks because his change was made after the PR where I originally wrote this test
fixes #23403