feat(TreeView): use Task instead of ValueTask

[ArgoZhang]

use Task instead of ValueTask

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符；如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号

Description

fixes #4736

Regression?

• Yes
• No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

• Replace ValueTask with Task in the TreeView component to improve consistency and potentially simplify asynchronous operations.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The PR changes the return type of the GetParentsState method in the TreeView component from ValueTask<List<CheckboxState>> to Task<List<CheckboxState>>. The implementation is updated to use Task.FromResult instead of ValueTask.FromResult for consistency.

Updated class diagram for TreeView component

classDiagram
    class TreeView {
        +Task<List<CheckboxState>> GetParentsState(List<int> items)
        -ValueTask<List<CheckboxState>> GetParentsState(List<int> items)
    }
    class CheckboxState
    TreeView --> CheckboxState

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Changed return type and implementation from ValueTask to Task	Modified method signature to return Task<List> instead of ValueTask<List> Updated return statement to use Task.FromResult instead of ValueTask.FromResult	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/TreeView/TreeView.razor.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#4736	Replace ValueTask with Task in TreeView component	✅

Possibly linked issues

• feat(TreeView): use Task instead of ValueTask #4736: The PR implements the change requested in the issue by replacing ValueTask with Task in TreeView.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (deaccd5) to head (98ae8dc).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #4737   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          620       620           
  Lines        27391     27391           
  Branches      3921      3921           
=========================================
  Hits         27391     27391           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests