perf(Table): improve performance for select all on header

[ArgoZhang]

improve performance for select all on header

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符；如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号

Description

fixes #4739

Regression?

• Yes
• No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Improve the performance of the 'select all' feature in the table header by optimizing the logic for checking selected rows and fixing the header checkbox state determination.

Bug Fixes:

• Fix the logic for determining the header checkbox state to correctly reflect the selection status of all rows.

Enhancements:

• Optimize the performance of the 'select all' functionality in the table header by refining the logic for checking selected rows.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The changes optimize the performance of the table's select-all functionality by replacing inefficient LINQ operations with more performant alternatives. The main improvements focus on the header checkbox state calculation and the row selection logic.

Updated class diagram for Table.razor.Checkbox.cs

classDiagram
    class Table {
        +CheckboxState HeaderCheckState()
        +Task OnHeaderCheck(CheckboxState state, TItem val)
    }

    class CheckboxState {
        <<enumeration>>
        Checked
        Unchecked
        Indeterminate
    }

    Table --> CheckboxState

    note for Table "Optimized performance for select-all functionality by modifying LINQ operations."

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Optimized header checkbox state calculation logic	Replaced nested Any() operation with more efficient Except().Any() Simplified nested Any() checks with direct comparison using Any() and Equals() Removed unnecessary local AnyRow function	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Table/Table.razor.Checkbox.cs
Improved bulk row selection performance	Replaced nested LINQ query with more efficient Intersect() operation for removing selected rows	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Table/Table.razor.Checkbox.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#4739	Improve performance of the select all checkbox functionality in table header	✅

Possibly linked issues

• perf(Table): improve performance for select all on header #4739: The PR implements performance improvements for 'select all' on header, directly addressing the issue.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (8308fb4) to head (c1246bb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #4740   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          620       620           
  Lines        27391     27390    -1     
  Branches      3921      3921           
=========================================
- Hits         27391     27390    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.