feat(TreeView): add cache for tree rows

[ArgoZhang]

add cache for tree rows

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符；如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号

Description

fixes #4832

Regression?

• Yes
• No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Add caching for tree rows in the TreeView component to enhance performance and refactor the GetTreeRows method for simplicity.

New Features:

• Introduce caching mechanism for tree rows in the TreeView component to improve performance.

Enhancements:

• Refactor the GetTreeRows method to be static and simplify its logic by removing unnecessary locking.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR implements a caching mechanism for tree rows in the TreeView component to improve performance. The implementation replaces the direct calculation of rows with a cached approach using a nullable backing field, and simplifies the row generation logic by removing unnecessary locking.

Class diagram for TreeView component changes

classDiagram
    class TreeView {
        +List~TreeViewItem~ Rows
        -List~TreeViewItem~ _rows
        +List~TreeViewItem~ GetTreeRows(List~TreeViewItem~ items)
    }
    class TreeViewItem {
        +bool IsExpand
        +List~TreeViewItem~ Items
    }
    TreeView "1" -- "*" TreeViewItem : contains
    note for TreeView "Added caching for tree rows using _rows field"

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Implement caching mechanism for tree rows	Add nullable backing field for rows cache Convert Rows property to use cached value with null-coalescing assignment Clear cache when reset is triggered Remove unnecessary locking mechanism Simplify GetTreeRows method by removing lock and cache assignment	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/TreeView/TreeView.razor.cs
Code formatting improvement in JSModule extension	Fix indentation in LoadModule method	src/BootstrapBlazor/Extensions/JSModuleExtensions.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#4832	Add caching mechanism for tree rows in TreeView component	✅

Possibly linked issues

• feat(TreeView): add cache for tree rows #4832: The PR implements caching for tree rows, directly addressing the issue's request.
• feat(TreeView): add cache for tree rows #4832: The PR adds caching for tree rows, addressing the issue of improving cache for TreeViewNode.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Please enhance the PR description with: 1) Performance benchmarks showing the impact of caching 2) Memory usage analysis for different tree sizes 3) Completed risk assessment with justification

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (3ede666) to head (f1f3368).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #4833   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          621       621           
  Lines        27408     27409    +1     
  Branches      3930      3930           
=========================================
+ Hits         27408     27409    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.