feat(DialogOption): add IsFade parameter

[ArgoZhang]

Link issues

fixes #5517

Summary By Copilot

This pull request includes several updates to the Dialog component in the BootstrapBlazor library, focusing on adding a new fade animation option and improving code consistency by standardizing private field names. Additionally, it includes updates to unit tests to cover the new functionality and translation of comments to English.

Component Enhancements:

• src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Dialog/Dialog.razor: Updated the Modal component to include the new _isFade property.
• src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Dialog/Dialog.razor.cs: Standardized private field names by prefixing them with underscores and added the _isFade property. [1] [2] [3]

Configuration Updates:

• src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Dialog/DialogOption.cs: Added the IsFade property to the DialogOption class and translated all comments from Chinese to English.

Version Update:

• src/BootstrapBlazor/BootstrapBlazor.csproj: Updated the version from 9.4.3-beta04 to 9.4.4.

Unit Tests:

• test/UnitTest/Components/DialogTest.cs: Added assertions to verify the IsFade property functionality in the Dialog component.
• test/UnitTest/Components/ModalTest.cs: Added checks to ensure the IsFade property is correctly handled in the Modal component. [1] [2]

Regression?

• Yes
• No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Adds the IsFade parameter to the Dialog component, allowing control over the fade animation. Also includes minor code improvements such as standardizing private field names and translating comments to English.

New Features:

• Adds the IsFade parameter to the Dialog component to control the fade animation.

Tests:

• Adds unit tests to verify the IsFade property functionality in the Dialog and Modal components.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces the IsFade parameter to the DialogOption class, standardizes private field naming in the Dialog component, translates comments to English, and updates unit tests to cover the new functionality. Additionally, the version number in the project file has been updated.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added IsFade parameter to DialogOption to control fade animations.	Added IsFade property to the DialogOption class. Set the default value of IsFade to true.	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Dialog/DialogOption.cs
Standardized private field naming in the Dialog component.	Prefixed private fields with underscores for consistency. Updated references to the renamed fields throughout the component.	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Dialog/Dialog.razor.cs src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Dialog/Dialog.razor
Translated comments in DialogOption.cs from Chinese to English.	Updated all comments to be in English for better accessibility and maintainability.	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Dialog/DialogOption.cs
Updated unit tests to verify the functionality of the IsFade parameter.	Added assertions to check if the fade animation is applied based on the IsFade property. Ensured that the IsFade property is correctly handled in both Dialog and Modal components.	test/UnitTest/Components/DialogTest.cs test/UnitTest/Components/ModalTest.cs
Updated the version number in the project file.	Incremented the version number from 9.4.3-beta04 to 9.4.4.	src/BootstrapBlazor/BootstrapBlazor.csproj

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#5517	Add an IsFade parameter to the DialogOption class to control the fade animation of the dialog.	✅

Possibly linked issues

• feat(DialogOption): add IsFade parameter #5517: The PR adds the IsFade parameter to the DialogOption class, which is the same change requested in the issue.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider adding a comment to the IsFade property explaining its purpose and usage.
• Good job on standardizing the private field names with underscores for consistency.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (28a9d85) to head (6ea1cbd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #5518   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          649       649           
  Lines        29572     29574    +2     
  Branches      4167      4167           
=========================================
+ Hits         29572     29574    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ArgoZhang]

@sourcery-ai review

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider adding a comment to explain why private fields are being renamed.
• The PR description is very detailed, but it might be more helpful to focus on the user-facing changes and the motivation behind them.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟡 Complexity: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}