Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix okta-tile refs #159

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 27, 2025
Merged

Conversation

opis-mark
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Corrects the README.md's use of okta-aws-tile to okta-tile which is the real parameter name.

Related Issue

Resolves #157

Motivation and Context

The documentation and examples should be accurate to best help those using it.

How Has This Been Tested?

This is only an update to documentation so no testing was done

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

In some places `docs/README.md` incorrectly referred to the `okta-tile` parameter as `okta-aws-tile`.

Resolves dowjones#157
@opis-mark opis-mark changed the title Docs/fix okta tile refs docs: fix okta-tile refs Feb 27, 2025
@opis-mark
Copy link
Contributor Author

it looks like maybe the OS for the tox tests changed and the newer OS doesn't support python 3.7. not sure if we want to continue supporting 3.7 or not

@sevignyj sevignyj merged commit adc4e93 into dowjones:main Feb 27, 2025
5 of 20 checks passed
@opis-mark opis-mark deleted the docs/fix-okta-tile-refs branch February 27, 2025 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants