-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 1.4k
Add security layer negotiation to the GSSAPI authentication. #1283
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -12,8 +12,13 @@ def _pack(f, value): | |
| raise ValueError(error) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def _unpack(f, data): | ||
| def _unpack(f, data, length=None): | ||
| try: | ||
| if type(data) is not str: | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What about There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yep. I'll change that. Thanks! |
||
| assert length is not None, 'length is required when unpacking from stream' | ||
| data = data.read(length) | ||
| assert length is None or length == len(data), \ | ||
| 'data for unpacking is not of the expected length' | ||
| (value,) = unpack(f, data) | ||
| return value | ||
| except error: | ||
|
|
@@ -27,7 +32,7 @@ def encode(cls, value): | |
|
|
||
| @classmethod | ||
| def decode(cls, data): | ||
| return _unpack('>b', data.read(1)) | ||
| return _unpack('>b', data, 1) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class Int16(AbstractType): | ||
|
|
@@ -37,7 +42,7 @@ def encode(cls, value): | |
|
|
||
| @classmethod | ||
| def decode(cls, data): | ||
| return _unpack('>h', data.read(2)) | ||
| return _unpack('>h', data, 2) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class Int32(AbstractType): | ||
|
|
@@ -47,7 +52,7 @@ def encode(cls, value): | |
|
|
||
| @classmethod | ||
| def decode(cls, data): | ||
| return _unpack('>i', data.read(4)) | ||
| return _unpack('>i', data, 4) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class Int64(AbstractType): | ||
|
|
@@ -57,7 +62,7 @@ def encode(cls, value): | |
|
|
||
| @classmethod | ||
| def decode(cls, data): | ||
| return _unpack('>q', data.read(8)) | ||
| return _unpack('>q', data, 8) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class String(AbstractType): | ||
|
|
@@ -110,7 +115,7 @@ def encode(cls, value): | |
|
|
||
| @classmethod | ||
| def decode(cls, data): | ||
| return _unpack('>?', data.read(1)) | ||
| return _unpack('>?', data, 1) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class Schema(AbstractType): | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my only concern is that this single call to
decode()is requiring a very big change to the low level protocol decoding that will touch everything. And while I agree that the protocol decoding probably should not require BytesIO (or some other stream), I am not excited about including that protocol change here. How aboutInt8.decode(BytesIO(msg[0]))?