-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add security layer negotiation to the GSSAPI authentication. #1283
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -12,8 +12,13 @@ def _pack(f, value): | |
raise ValueError(error) | ||
|
||
|
||
def _unpack(f, data): | ||
def _unpack(f, data, length=None): | ||
try: | ||
if type(data) is not str: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What about There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yep. I'll change that. Thanks! |
||
assert length is not None, 'length is required when unpacking from stream' | ||
data = data.read(length) | ||
assert length is None or length == len(data), \ | ||
'data for unpacking is not of the expected length' | ||
(value,) = unpack(f, data) | ||
return value | ||
except error: | ||
|
@@ -27,7 +32,7 @@ def encode(cls, value): | |
|
||
@classmethod | ||
def decode(cls, data): | ||
return _unpack('>b', data.read(1)) | ||
return _unpack('>b', data, 1) | ||
|
||
|
||
class Int16(AbstractType): | ||
|
@@ -37,7 +42,7 @@ def encode(cls, value): | |
|
||
@classmethod | ||
def decode(cls, data): | ||
return _unpack('>h', data.read(2)) | ||
return _unpack('>h', data, 2) | ||
|
||
|
||
class Int32(AbstractType): | ||
|
@@ -47,7 +52,7 @@ def encode(cls, value): | |
|
||
@classmethod | ||
def decode(cls, data): | ||
return _unpack('>i', data.read(4)) | ||
return _unpack('>i', data, 4) | ||
|
||
|
||
class Int64(AbstractType): | ||
|
@@ -57,7 +62,7 @@ def encode(cls, value): | |
|
||
@classmethod | ||
def decode(cls, data): | ||
return _unpack('>q', data.read(8)) | ||
return _unpack('>q', data, 8) | ||
|
||
|
||
class String(AbstractType): | ||
|
@@ -110,7 +115,7 @@ def encode(cls, value): | |
|
||
@classmethod | ||
def decode(cls, data): | ||
return _unpack('>?', data.read(1)) | ||
return _unpack('>?', data, 1) | ||
|
||
|
||
class Schema(AbstractType): | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my only concern is that this single call to
decode()
is requiring a very big change to the low level protocol decoding that will touch everything. And while I agree that the protocol decoding probably should not require BytesIO (or some other stream), I am not excited about including that protocol change here. How aboutInt8.decode(BytesIO(msg[0]))
?