Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PG] Add missing select functions in with clause #1467

Closed

Conversation

L-Mario564
Copy link
Collaborator

When using the with clause, the PG dialect for Drizzle would only expose select. This PR makes it so you can also use selectDistinct and selectDistinctOn after the with clause.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Angelelz Angelelz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are there any tests we could implement to validate this addition?

@L-Mario564
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Are there any tests we could implement to validate this addition?

I've added them.

@L-Mario564
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closed in favor of #1578.

@L-Mario564 L-Mario564 closed this Nov 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants