You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 15, 2018. It is now read-only.
As was discovered in #160, there are some problems with the current implementation of accessors. It uses an isReadonly property to tell if an accessor only has a get accessor.
Overall, the current implementation is not very good. It would be better to have a kind property with the following enum:
What was also discovered is that currently only get and get/set accessors are supported—not set-only accessors. The code will be changed to support this scenario as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As was discovered in #160, there are some problems with the current implementation of accessors. It uses an
isReadonly
property to tell if an accessor only has a get accessor.Overall, the current implementation is not very good. It would be better to have a
kind
property with the following enum:What was also discovered is that currently only get and get/set accessors are supported—not set-only accessors. The code will be changed to support this scenario as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: