Feature 2540 2485 compilation

[jprestop]

Expected Differences

• Do these changes introduce new tools, command line arguments, or configuration file options? [No]
  
  If yes, please describe:
  

• Do these changes modify the structure of existing or add new output data types (e.g. statistic line types or NetCDF variables)? [No]
  
  If yes, please describe:
  

Pull Request Testing

• Describe testing already performed for these changes:
  
  I tested the script on WCOSS2 Acorn, which uses modules to load both the compiler and the python versions. I test the new functionality for both and got successful runs. I tested the script on Cheyenne, which uses modules to load the compiler, but not Python, and got successful runs. I tested the new compiler specification functionality on seneca (with a subset of the script since that compiler doesn't exist on seneca and neither does the module load functionality) using gnu8 for the COMPILER_NAME, as described in this comment from Discussion 2485.

• Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:
  
  Review the code changes, if desired. I believe the script has been well tested. Bugs were found and fixed in testing.

• Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? [See below]
  I have updated the documentation within the script. An overhaul for more and better documentation is needed in the User's Guide and/or the website, but there will be an issue created by @j-opatz with the results from the focus group. I am waiting until that issue is created to revamp the script documentation in the User's Guide and/or the website.

• Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [N/A]

• Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [No]
  
  If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:
  

• Please complete this pull request review by [20230524].
  

Pull Request Checklist

See the METplus Workflow for details.

• Review the source issue metadata (required labels, projects, and milestone).
• Complete the PR definition above.
• Ensure the PR title matches the feature or bugfix branch name.
• Define the PR metadata, as permissions allow.
  Select: Reviewer(s)
  Select: Organization level software support Project or Repository level development cycle Project
  Select: Milestone as the version that will include these changes
• After submitting the PR, select Development issue with the original issue number.
• After the PR is approved, merge your changes. If permissions do not allow this, request that the reviewer do the merge.
• Close the linked issue and delete your feature or bugfix branch from GitHub.

[JohnHalleyGotway]

I approve of these changes.

Julie, sorry for the delay. I forgot about this one. I see that all GHA tests have passed but I performed no additional testing. I did skim through the code changes looking for typos but didn't find anything. Thanks for getting these changes in!