Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature 875 poe precip use case #940

Closed
wants to merge 32 commits into from

Conversation

j-opatz
Copy link
Contributor

@j-opatz j-opatz commented May 27, 2021

Pull Request Testing

  • Describe testing already performed for these changes:
    This branch is in active use, necessary for any time POE data is being run through SeriesAnalysis

  • Recommend testing for the reviewer(s) to perform, including the location of input datasets, and any additional instructions:
    The develop branch has already been merged with this one so it's very close to up-to-date. This is more of a house-keeping PR, just needs to make it to the next Beta
    Documentation updates were made in the Glossary, Python Wrappers, and met_tool_wrapper for the use case -- those should be checked for accuracy

  • Do these changes include sufficient documentation updates, ensuring that no errors or warnings exist in the build of the documentation? **[Yes]**Documentation is updated as needed

  • Do these changes include sufficient testing updates? [Yes]

  • Will this PR result in changes to the test suite? [No]

    If yes, describe the new output and/or changes to the existing output:

  • Please complete this pull request review by [Fill in date].
    06/04/2021

Pull Request Checklist

See the METplus Workflow for details.

  • Complete the PR definition above.
  • Ensure the PR title matches the feature or bugfix branch name.
  • Define the PR metadata, as permissions allow.
    Select: Reviewer(s)
    Select: Organization level software support Project or Repository level development cycle Project
    Select: Milestone as the version that will include these changes
  • After submitting the PR, select Linked issues with the original issue number.
  • After the PR is approved, merge your changes. If permissions do not allow this, request that the reviewer do the merge.
  • Close the linked issue and delete your feature or bugfix branch from GitHub.

georgemccabe and others added 24 commits March 11, 2021 15:59
…read on init without sub and just substitute values for each runtime
…ecip_useCase

To properly test use case that needs changes from both branches
…ip_useCase

need to test against old fix for climo with new useCase relevant
capabilities
@j-opatz j-opatz added this to the METplus-4.0.1 Bugfix milestone May 27, 2021
@j-opatz j-opatz requested a review from georgemccabe May 27, 2021 19:02
@j-opatz j-opatz self-assigned this May 27, 2021
@j-opatz j-opatz linked an issue May 27, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
21 tasks
@JohnHalleyGotway
Copy link
Collaborator

Please note that I made a few minor tweaks on this PR:

  • Removed assignee (@j-opatz) and label "component: use case configuration" since the issue checklist doesn't tell us to use those for PR's.
  • Since this is assigned to project "METplus-4.1.0-beta1" and is feature branch merging changes into develop, I assume these changes for for the next release, METplus-4.1.0. So I changed the milestone from "METplus-4.0.1 Bugfix" to "METplus-4.1.0", assuming that was a mistake.

@georgemccabe
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this PR because there were issues with merging changes into this branch that we are having difficulty reverting properly. @j-opatz will create a new PR with only the new changes.

@j-opatz j-opatz deleted the feature_875_POE_precip_useCase branch June 1, 2021 21:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants