Plot the new ECNT statistics: SPREAD_MD, MAE, MAE_OERR, BIAS_RATIO, ME_GE_OBS, and ME_LT_OBS #434
Closed
6 of 21 tasks
Labels
METviewer: Plotting
METviewer: Scorecard
METviewer: Statistics
priority: high
High Priority
reporting: DTC NOAA R2O
NOAA Research to Operations DTC Project
requestor: NOAA/EMC
NOAA Environmental Modeling Center
requestor: UK Met Office
United Kingdom Met Office
required: FOR DEVELOPMENT RELEASE
Required to be completed in the development release for the assigned project
type: enhancement
Improve something that it is currently doing
Milestone
Describe the Enhancement
MET development version 11.0.0-beta4 made several changes to the "stat" output. This issue is to enhance METplotpy to plot the newly added statistics and enable them to be included in scorecards.
I don't see a need to plot the N_GE_OBS and N_LT_OBS columns that were also added, but they are needed in the aggregation of the other columns.
Issue Add the Mean Absolute Difference (SPREAD_MD) to the ECNT line type MET#2332 adds 1 new column (SPREAD_MD) to the ECNT line type generated by Ensemble-Stat and the HiRA method in Point-Stat. See Table 13.2. The SPREAD_MD is the ensemble mean absolute difference and is an alternative measure of ensemble spread. This column should be aggregated over multiple cases using a weighted average approach, where the weight is defined by the number of matched pairs in the TOTAL column.
Issue Add MAE to the ECNT line type from Ensemble-Stat and for HiRA MET#2325 adds 2 new columns (MAE and MAE_OERR) to the ECNT line type generated by Ensemble-Stat and the HiRA method in Point-Stat. See Table 13.2. The MAE is the mean absolute error. These columns should be aggregated together over multiple cases using a weighted average approach, where the weight is defined by the number of matched pairs in the TOTAL column.
These MAE's should be added to the list of statistics where 0 is the perfect score.
The ME_GE_OBS and ME_LT_OBS columns are mean errors and should added to list of statistics where 0 is the perfect score.
The BIAS_RATIO is the ratio of those 2 ME values, and I suppose a perfect score would be 0/0 which is undefined. This probably should go in the list of statistics where 1 is the perfect score... where the amount of high bias equal the amount of low bias. In this way, its similar to the frequency bias (FBIAS) statistic.
Sample data for this issue can be found in the nightly build output in seneca:/d1/projects/MET/MET_regression/develop/NB20221101/MET-develop/test_output (or a more recent date).
And here's a tarfile of that output:
ftp://ftp.rap.ucar.edu/incoming/irap/met_help/NB20221101_develop_test_output.tar.gz
Time Estimate
Estimate the amount of work required here.
Issues should represent approximately 1 to 3 days of work.
Sub-Issues
Consider breaking the enhancement down into sub-issues.
Relevant Deadlines
List relevant project deadlines here or state NONE.
Funding Source
Split 2799991 and 2773542
Define the Metadata
Assignee
Labels
Projects and Milestone
Define Related Issue(s)
Consider the impact to the other METplus components.
Enhancement Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.
Branch name:
feature_<Issue Number>_<Description>
Pull request:
feature <Issue Number> <Description>
Select: Reviewer(s) and Linked issues
Select: Repository level development cycle Project for the next official release
Select: Milestone as the next official version
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: