Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix projected frequencies #368
base: v1.4.5
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix projected frequencies #368
Changes from all commits
640e135
4e6a7c1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My suggestion editing from this line:
If the rank of matrix is k, then first k columns of SVD will be the orthonormal basis for the column space. Since we started from only the translation and rotation vectors, the first 5 or 6 columns of U will be translation and rotation basis - and the rest will be orthogonal vectors corresponding to vibration (since U always produces an orthonormal basis, as far as i understand!)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this whole part is not needed, and the original code was fine(?). Projecting the Hessian should mean that we are safe to assume the first 5 or 6 columns to be zero. If they are not zero - then that is probably the measure of how much numerical error there is in the Hessian. (btw, I have been trying to understand the math - and so far I have been able to mathematically prove that the first 5 / 6 columns of the projected Hessian definitely have to be zero. For the first 5 / 6 rows it also makes intuitive sense - but I haven't been able to find the mathematical proof yet)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same with this part - I think it is not required.