Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix LoremIpsum import for esm #226

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 25, 2018
Merged

Fix LoremIpsum import for esm #226

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 25, 2018

Conversation

hath995
Copy link
Contributor

@hath995 hath995 commented Oct 24, 2018

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 91.734% when pulling 6523bc5 on hath995:master into 5f86fe8 on dubzzz:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 91.734% when pulling 6523bc5 on hath995:master into 5f86fe8 on dubzzz:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 24, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.07%) to 91.663% when pulling b50082e on hath995:master into 5f86fe8 on dubzzz:master.

Copy link
Owner

@dubzzz dubzzz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you have any idea to avoid such regression in the past? Is there a test we could add for that purpose (in another review)?

package.json Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "fast-check",
"version": "1.7.0",
"version": "1.7.1",
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not bump manually, I will on my side with a specific commit.

@@ -1,18 +1,25 @@
// tslint:disable-next-line:no-var-requires
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can remove this line now

@hath995
Copy link
Contributor Author

hath995 commented Oct 25, 2018

I think if we added a headless browser test to make sure it can run in the browser.

https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/chrome
https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/04/headless-chrome

I may give this a shot this weekend.

Copy link
Owner

@dubzzz dubzzz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for the fix :)

@dubzzz dubzzz merged commit da74a54 into dubzzz:master Oct 25, 2018
@dubzzz
Copy link
Owner

dubzzz commented Oct 25, 2018

I will publish the new version tomorrow morning (Paris time)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants