Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stages/ostree.deploy.container: add aleph file #10
stages/ostree.deploy.container: add aleph file #10
Changes from all commits
5579257
c45569a
2d20c73
70a98b1
ddfd68b
5129eeb
43f2e10
732dfb3
e14c1cc
e56d1d5
2385cd0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ahh. I hadn't realized we'd need to make this change.. I honestly think this is the way it should be, but the osbuild devs might want stdout to still go to stderr to keep the same behavior. We can still achieve that goal if they ask us by just doing:
but let's wait and see what they say.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there even a use case in osbuild for having multiple deployments in the image? I'd just nuke those parameters and always do the glob approach. That should simplify some of the callers currently doing extra work to prepare those params.
Obviously fine to do as a follow-up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, I think there is an argument to make for that - +1 for a follow up. We'd need to keep supporting specifying the options even though they would do nothing.