Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(migration): exclude specific non valid chainID #1678

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mtsitrin
Copy link
Contributor

Description


Closes #XXX

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow-up issues.

PR review checkboxes:

I have...

  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Targeted PR against the correct branch
  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Linked to the GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design
  • Targets only one GitHub issue
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Wrote relevant migration scripts if necessary
  • All CI checks have passed
  • Added relevant godoc comments
  • Updated the scripts for local run, e.g genesis_config_commands.sh if the PR changes parameters
  • Add an issue in the e2e-tests repo if necessary

SDK Checklist

  • Import/Export Genesis
  • Registered Invariants
  • Registered Events
  • Updated openapi.yaml
  • No usage of go map
  • No usage of time.Now()
  • Used fixed point arithmetic and not float arithmetic
  • Avoid panicking in Begin/End block as much as possible
  • No unexpected math Overflow
  • Used sendCoin and not SendCoins
  • Out-of-block compute is bounded
  • No serialized ID at the end of store keys
  • UInt to byte conversion should use BigEndian

Full security checklist here


For Reviewer:

  • Confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Reviewers assigned
  • Confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed

After reviewer approval:

  • In case the PR targets the main branch, PR should not be squash merge in order to keep meaningful git history.
  • In case the PR targets a release branch, PR must be rebased.

@mtsitrin mtsitrin requested a review from a team as a code owner December 27, 2024 16:55
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.11765% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 22.55%. Comparing base (d0166dd) to head (19b7560).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
app/upgrades/v4/upgrade.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1678      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.62%   22.55%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         590      590              
  Lines      129309   129980     +671     
==========================================
+ Hits        29250    29322      +72     
- Misses      96174    96767     +593     
- Partials     3885     3891       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@omritoptix omritoptix marked this pull request as draft December 28, 2024 09:19
@mtsitrin mtsitrin force-pushed the hotfix/blumbus_support branch from 1ffd818 to e8530b0 Compare December 28, 2024 10:00
omritoptix
omritoptix previously approved these changes Dec 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants