Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove jitpack requirement #77

Merged

Conversation

klieber
Copy link
Contributor

@klieber klieber commented Mar 10, 2019

The only reason we need the Jitpack repository at this point if for the json-schema package and newer versions of that package are available in maven central. This change should remove the Jitpack requirement which should allow restdocs-api-spec to be pushed to maven central. This will also allow me to push restdocs-spec-maven-plugin to maven central as well which is important for a lot of maven users.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 95.196% when pulling f8d8dce on klieber:chore/remove-jitpack-requirement into e005360 on ePages-de:master.

Copy link
Contributor

@mduesterhoeft mduesterhoeft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Kyle,
I am happy to see you back.

Great point. I always wanted the jitpack dependency to go away since we are no longer publishing there. So I am really happy about this information and the PR. Would you mind also updating:

@klieber
Copy link
Contributor Author

klieber commented Mar 11, 2019

I tried updating the samples but I don't think I can until after you release a new version without the Jitpack dependency. Similar ly, the README references a specific version that still would require Jitpack so I was hesitant to update it. I'd be happy to open another pull request once the new release is created.

@mduesterhoeft mduesterhoeft merged commit fd7e3ba into ePages-de:master Mar 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants