Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for CP2K (cp2k.py) #3113

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

branfosj
Copy link
Member

@branfosj branfosj commented Jan 29, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

  • No use of EB_CP2K in easyconfigs or blocks

@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @branfosj

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

  • SUCCESS Libint-2.7.2-GCC-11.3.0-lmax-6-cp2k.eb
  • SUCCESS libvori-220621-GCCcore-11.3.0.eb
  • SUCCESS CP2K-9.1-foss-2022a.eb

Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/91236048e3678b6db418d717130fe2c1 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

branfosj commented Feb 9, 2024

Test report by @branfosj

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

  • SUCCESS CP2K-9.1-foss-2022a.eb

Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03b - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/c2558380a474378bb5d996db11cb3b76 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@jfgrimm jfgrimm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@jfgrimm jfgrimm merged commit ad3f3ee into easybuilders:5.0.x Feb 9, 2024
17 checks passed
@branfosj branfosj deleted the 20240129200220_new_pr_cp2k branch February 9, 2024 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants